My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-2009 PR MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Minutes
>
2000 - 2019
>
2009
>
11-18-2009 PR MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2010 11:11:18 AM
Creation date
1/15/2010 11:11:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRM
date
11/18/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park & Recreation Commission Minutes Page 5 <br />November 18, 2009 <br />------------------------------------ <br />Shoreview charges non-resident fees, it is looked at as residents covered the cost of <br />the parks and Community Center and therefore should receive a discount as <br />compared to non-residents. <br />Farmington does not charge non-resident fee, their computer program system does <br />not screen between residents and non residents. It is considered that general funds <br />covers administrative costs, programs need to cover direct costs so they want as <br />many participants as possible. <br />New Ulm does charge anon-resident fee, 10% is added on to the program fee. <br />Currently, 50% of Elk River's recreation program registrations are done online. Our <br />software does have the ability to charge anon- resident fee. This would need to be <br />on the honor system because we would have no way of verifying residency online. <br />Mr. Maertz stated that if the Parks Commission wishes to recommend anon-resident <br />fee to the City Council, staff recommends the following: <br />• $5 non-resident fee for programs that cost under $50. <br />• $10 non-resident fee for programs that cost over $50. <br />Mr. Maertz shared that it is difficult to predict what price-point would result in <br />driving people away and result in reduced revenue. If these fees are adopted staff <br />would recommend a review of non-resident registrations be conducted after the first <br />year. <br />Council Member Zerwas shared that his thoughts on the issue have not changed <br />since the October Parks Commission meeting. While looking at cut across the board <br />and still needing to provide the highest level of service to residents and non-residents <br />who want to participate should pay more. <br />Commissioner Jaker is in line with the staff recommendation. It is a principle of <br />"cost-sharing", which can be used in diffusing any arguments about the non-resident <br />fee. <br />Commissioner Anderson likes the idea of a one year check up and questioned if the <br />non-resident fee with extend to other programs outside of the recreation programs. <br />Mr. Maertz stated that at this point it would only include the recreation programs <br />excluding the adult softball league which is not a subsidized program. <br />MOVED BY COMMISSIONER JAKER AND SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER NIZIOLEK TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY <br />COUNCIL TO IMPLEMENT A $5 NON-RESIDENT FEE FOR <br />PROGRAMS THAT COST UNDER $50 AND $10 NON-RESIDENT FEE <br />FOR PROGRAMS THAT COST OVER $50 FOR RECREATION <br />PROGRAMS AND TO REVIEW PROGRAMS REGISTRATION FEES <br />AFTER THE FIRST YEAR. MOTION CARRIED 5-1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.