My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9. SR 08-28-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
08-28-1995
>
9. SR 08-28-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2009 12:22:38 PM
Creation date
12/3/2009 12:22:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/28/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• change is authorized by the City Council, then the property tax for the <br />General Fund goes up approximately $237,000. <br />With the above scenario, there are no additional monies available for typical <br />inflationary increases in expenditures, new employees, new programs or new <br />capital outlay purchases above what is typically financed. Additionally, we <br />may not, as a city, see 10 percent increases in our NTC on an annual basis. <br />Therefore, our main challenge for the next few years is how to finance <br />increasing operating expenses with limited additional annual revenues. <br />When the City Council says "hold the line" on the tax rate, they are also <br />saying hold the line on employee expenses. The city budget issues are <br />getting more complex each year. There are no magic answers for how to <br />balance the desire for low taxes with need for more employees to provide <br />better services, along with the city treating its employees fair in wages and <br />benefits. <br />The City Council has discussed the police budget a number of times in the <br />past. The police budget typically is a focal point of our budget discussions as <br />it is the biggest single department in the city. A previously distributed fact <br />sheet showed the police department as being 33 percent of the total of the <br />1987 budget and this amount increasing to over 37 percent of the total in <br />1994. Additionally, as the Council knows, about 85 percent of the police <br />• budget is personnel. Police Personal Services is over $1.1 million in 1996. <br />Accordingly, when we talk about controlling expenses, we are talking about <br />personnel and, mainly, the police department personnel. This certainly is an <br />oversimplification of the issue, but police personnel is a major factor in our <br />annual budget consideration. <br />If the City Council wants to keep the tax rate unchanged and allow the city <br />tax base catch up to the growth of city government, then we should limit <br />additional new employees for a year or so. This may be difficult when we are <br />talking about a rental inspection program, a fire inspection program, a COPS <br />FAST program, a mechanic or laborer in the street department, and clerical <br />support staff for the police and other departments. All city departments can <br />do a better job with additional employees. However, sometimes departments <br />can't always get what they want and departments must do the best they can <br />with the resources that are allocated. Additionally, there are other <br />efficiencies that can be realized within departments based on new technology. <br />The Council will see this in the 1996 budget proposal whereby $20,000 is <br />being requested by the police department to put personal computers into the <br />police vehicles. These "one time" type of expenditures (or financed over a few <br />years) improve the efficiency within the department and sometimes need to <br />be financed in lieu of additional personnel. <br />C7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.