My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.2. SR 06-19-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
06-19-1995
>
7.2. SR 06-19-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2009 2:22:43 PM
Creation date
11/30/2009 2:22:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/19/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The current requirements establish a sign setback of 3'4" from the outer lease <br />limits (wall). Typically, this "outer limit" happens to be a brick column. <br />• However, with smaller bays there is now the opportunity to create two tenant <br />spaces within each column. <br />The proposed deviation from the current requirements is the sign setback from the <br />common wall within the columns. It is requested the sign setback be scaled back <br />to 2 feet. The overall squaze footage will not change; rather, it will allow <br />flexibility with sign location and style of sign. <br />It is staff s understanding Kraus-Anderson would like to utilize this same standazd <br />on Building B and C when necessary. <br />Site Plan <br />1. The new retaining wall on the south side of the service drive should consist of a <br />similar block material used on the retaining walls south of Tazget. <br />2. It was not cleaz on the site plans how high this retaining wall would have to be. <br />Therefore, a detail should be submitted along with the final set of plans. <br />Attached, is a sign package proposed for building "E". This package is slightly different <br />`' y~ than building's B and C. The primary difference occurs on the smaller signs where it <br />becomes difficult to maintain 3' feet 4" inches from each edge of leased space. Staff will <br />discuss this further at Tuesday's meeting. <br />• Building rch't c ~*e <br />The building materials appeaz to be similaz to Building B and C next to <br />Target. This will strengthen the continuity of the project's design. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />It is recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval of the conditional use <br />permit for Kraus-Anderson of Elk River, Inc., allowing construction of a 16,000 square <br />foot multi-tenant retail building in Elk Pazk Center Planned Unit Development, with the <br />following conditions: <br />Comments stated in the staff report dated May 23, 1995 being <br />incorporated into revised set of plans and submitted for final approval <br />prior to issuance of the building permit. <br />• <br />s:p] anning:pecu95-07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.