Laserfiche WebLink
Memo to Planning Commission <br />Page 3 <br />September 24, 1996 <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a 5 <br />foot variance request to allow pavement within 5 feet of the property line along <br />the north side of the existing building based on the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The literal enforcement of the ordinance will cause undue hardship for the <br />applicant because the only reasonable access to the rear of the long narrow <br />lot is along the north side of the existing building. In order to provided the <br />necessary access, the pavement will have to be within 10 feet of the north <br />property line adjacent to the existing building. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />The special conditions which are peculiar to this property is it's long <br />narrow dimensions and the steep slope down to the rear of the of the lot <br /> <br />Literal application of the Ordinance will deprive the applicant property <br />rights enjoyed by other properties in the neighborhood. <br /> <br />There are special circumstances or conditions that are not a consequence <br />of the apphcant's actions in that the location of the building, shape of the <br />lot and topography were not a result of any actions made by the applicant. <br /> <br />The granting of this variance will not be injurious or adversely affect the <br />health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood provided drainage is <br />controlled by curbing and at least 5 feet of grass between the pavement <br />and the north property line. <br /> <br />It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the <br />request for the following variances: <br /> To allow pavement within 10 feet of the north and south property hnes <br /> (outside the area identified above) <br />· Concrete curb and gutter requirement (may not apply to rear of property if <br /> property is rezoned to light industrial) <br />· Architectural standards for exterior building finishes <br /> based on the following findings: <br /> <br />The literal enforcement of the Ordinance will not cause undue hardship <br />for the applicant because there is no physical, topographic or vegetative <br /> <br /> <br />