Laserfiche WebLink
property goes down and the tax rate stays the same, the property will owe less in tax. If the <br />tax rate goes up, the property may still have a reduction in tax due depending upon if the <br />individual property value decreased more or less than the total NTC. <br /> <br />At this point there are too many variables to calculate precisely the tax rate or tax impact for <br />2010. That said, below are a few examples of what the impact would be using the <br />preliminary NTC data. These examples exclude the County TIF error correction tax rate of <br />.160. <br /> <br />If the 2010 tax levy is set to include the same amount of revenue from property tax and state <br />aids is in the adopted 2009 budget the levy would increase to $11,878,848, a six percent <br />increase, and the tax rate would be 47.731. The 2009 tax rate (excluding the TIF correction) <br />is 43.120. I selected a home in Trott Brook Farms and an industrial property in Elk Park <br />Center to determine the impact of this tax rate increase. The residential property’s value <br />decreased 8.6 percent to 237,400. The property owner’s tax for 2010 would increase $13. A <br />commercial or industrial (C/I) property with a value of $1,480,800 that did not change from <br />2009 to 2010 would have a tax increase of $1,331. <br /> <br />If the 2010 tax levy is set to achieve the same tax rate as this year, the total levy would <br />decrease by $459,471 or 4.11 percent and the general fund total tax and aid revenue would <br />decrease by $926,488. Under this scenario the same residential property state above would <br />have a $97 decrease in its tax bill. The C/I property’s tax would not change. <br /> <br />If the 2010 tax levy is set to increase five percent, the residential property tax would change <br />less than $1. The C/I property would increase $1,182. <br /> <br />The important item to keep in mind is that because most residential property values have <br />decreased in value, even if the tax rate increases, taxes on these properties would decrease. <br />On the other hand, most commercial and industrial property, other than downtown <br />property, did not decrease. Therefore, any increase in tax rate will cause most C/I property <br />tax to increase. More information on this will be presented at the meeting. <br /> <br />Proposed Budget Summary <br />The proposed 2010 budgeted expenditures are similar to the 2009 amended budget. The <br />proposal is based on no new employees, no cost of living increase, a five percent increase in <br />flexible benefit contributions, and only necessary price increases in other categories. There <br />are no program additions that require significant new or increased funding. Revenues for <br />2010 are projected to decrease slightly because of decreased development activity and flat or <br />lower actual revenues in other areas. Of course, the tax levy will ultimately determine the <br />amount available to meet expected expenditures. The budget detail will be presented in its <br />entirety on August 10. <br /> <br />Finally, there are several items to note about the budgets that will be discussed on Monday. <br />First, the City did not receive funding through the COPS Hiring Recovery Program to hire <br />an additional police officer. The application is being held and will be reconsidered if <br />additional funding becomes available. Second, staff will be prepared to discuss the new law <br />allowing cities to use administrative citations for certain traffic offenses. Chief Beahen will <br />be in attendance to discuss these issues and answer questions about the police department <br /> <br />