My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1. SR 07-20-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2009
>
07-20-2009
>
7.1. SR 07-20-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2009 3:41:54 PM
Creation date
7/17/2009 3:41:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/20/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Improvement Page 2 <br />July 2Q 2009 <br />of Rum River Contracting, since it is a per unit contract, I will be prepared to recommend that the <br />City Council reduce the assessment rate per unit from $4,500 to $3,750. <br />One of the issues that the City Council should be prepared to address is whether or not the <br />residential properties at the corners of Main Street with Norfolk, Morton, and Lowell Avenues <br />should be included in the assessment of this project. Currently, they are all included in the <br />assessment roll and have been noticed of this hearing and the proposed assessment to their <br />property. As a way of background, Main Street was reconstructed in 1988 and all of these <br />properties were assessed for that street reconstruction at that time. In the 2003 and 2005 street <br />reconstruction projects there were also properties similar to these affected at the corners of Main <br />Street and streets within those projects. Those properties were eliminated from the assessment <br />roll of the 2003 and 2005 projects because they had previously paid an assessment in 1988 for the <br />Main Street reconstruction. <br />Somewhat different than these residential properties are the First National Bank and Dare <br />Funeral Home properties. They are proposed to be assessed two units each for the work on King <br />Avenue. As you are aware, Main Street in front of these properties was overlaid last year and no <br />assessment was levied. <br />At the time of this memo, staff has not received any written objection to the proposed <br />assessment. The only contact we have received is the email all Council members received from <br />Don and Kitty Schumacher, who are unable to attend the meeting. A copy of that email is <br />attached for your reference. <br />At the close of the public hearing/assessment hearing, it would be appropriate for the City <br />Council to consider adoption of the resolutions. The first resolution orders the improvement and <br />requires a 4/5 vote of the City Council; the second resolution adopts the assessment roll. This <br />can be adopted with any changes the city deems appropriate based on input at the public hearing. <br />This would include reducing the assessment rate from $4,500 per unit to $3,750 per unit. The <br />final resolution awards the contract to Rum River Contracting in the amount of $238,156.60. <br />Financial Impact <br />Based on the recommended reduction in the assessment rate from $4,500 per unit to $3,750 per <br />unit, the city's contribution to this project will be approximately 1 /3 the cost with approximately <br />2/3 of the cost being assessed to the affected properties. The city has budgeted in the Capital <br />Improvement Program for this street reconstruction with the city's share coming from Street <br />Reserves. There will be a small contribution from the Elk River Municipal Utilities for minor <br />adjustments to the water system in the area that they have requested. <br />Attachments <br />• Bid tabulation <br />• Resolution Ordering the Improvement <br />• Resolution Adopting the Assessment Roll <br />• Resolution Accepting the Bid and Authorizing Execution of the Contract <br />• Assessment Roll <br />• E-mail from the Schumachers <br />• Letters from residents received after this memo was submitted <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.