Laserfiche WebLink
signs were documented with photos. At the December 1, 2008 Council meeting, staff presented what <br />they had found in regards to the commercial construction and real estate signs. Only a few of the signs <br />reviewed were more than 32 square feet in size. 'The council concurred that 64 square foot signs were too <br />large and suggested staff make changes. The proposed changes were made accordingly in the proposed <br />language. <br />Large Lot SignaQe <br />If it is the council's desire to accommodate large lots such as car dealerships, staff is recommending the <br />following language: <br />One freestanding sign may be permitted for every 300 feet of street frontage measured along a single street. The frontage <br />shall only include the property in which the principal use is located on which the sign is advertising. The signage may <br />only be placed on the street frontage from which the calculations were taken. The additional sign(s) shall be subject to <br />the side and height limitations of the fzrst allowed freestanding or monument sign and may be placed no closer than <br />150 feet to any other freestanding or monument sign. <br />Staff is proposing this change be only for the C3 zoning district and not the I1 and I2 zoning districts. <br />The reason for this is highway commercial properties often rely on "grabbing" drive-by traffic where <br />industrial properties typically do not or are not expected to. The I1 and I2 zoning districts will continue <br />to have the ability to have two signs if their property exceeds 300 feet. <br />TeTborar,~Signs <br />Staff is suggesting modifying and adding the language `OOnly signs for the community events listed in Section 38- <br />383 (6) may be placed on city properties ". <br />The reason for this is to take away the City Administrator, or designee, determination of what events may <br />or may not be advertised on city property. This process adds time unnecessarily to the process. The <br />ordinance already specifies community events in Section 38-383 (6). <br />Staff will continue to research the enforcement policies regarding temporary signs and come back at a <br />later time with recommendations. <br />Redundant Sections <br />Upon further review, Sections 30-860 (4) and 30-866 (5) both refer to political signs but are not <br />redundant. Section 30-860 (4) is related to what types of signs are exempt from permit requirements and <br />Section 30-866 (5) is referencing what signs are allowed in all districts. <br />Suns in Citizen's Yards <br />There was a question regarding if a non-profit event such as the "Taste of Elk River" could have a <br />temporary sign on private property. Any private property owner may place a sign, with a permit, on <br />his/her property in support of a non-profit organization. The temporary sign section 30-866 (7) allows <br />nonprofit or charitable organizations as defined by Internal Revenue Code section 501(C)(3) to have off- <br />premises signs fox their fundraising activities, provided they obtain permission from the property owner. <br />Nonprofit organizations shall be limited to three signs per event and the signs shall not exceed the <br />number of days allowed in subsection (7)a of this section. If event is advertised for more than 30 days, it <br />shall count toward that property's 90-day limit for temporary signage. <br />S:\PLANNING MAIN\Case Files\OA\OA 09-01 Sign Ord Update\OA 09-01_CC-4.doc <br />