Laserfiche WebLink
Case File: CU 09-12 ERL CUP <br />Page 7 Ciry of Elk Rivex <br />Additionally, there are financial and development related impacts as outlined in the most recent <br />HKGi report. Expansion of the Landfill will prevent future development of the expansion area and <br />could discourage new development in the surrounding area as analyzed in the attached 2009 HKGi <br />report. This report identifies direct and peripheral areas of impact from a Landfill expansion. The <br />direct impacts are defined as the lands within the boundary of the expansion area, or the entire SDA <br />area. These impacts are objective and more easily quantifiable. No future development will be <br />possible on the Landfill. The peripheral impacts axe less objective and less quantifiable. They are <br />driven by site specific characteristics such as wind direction, topography, existing land uses and <br />infrastructure. Without the expansion of the Landfill, the City has the potential to develop the 221" <br />intersection into a broader mix of highway business uses which will help increase the tax base for the <br />area thus providing more and potentially higher paying jobs. <br />In summary, the 2009 report states the following conclusions/findings: <br />1. Expansion of the ERL has both direct and peripheral land use impacts on the City of Elk <br />River. These impacts translate directly into financial impacts. <br />2. Lost development opportunity on the SDA and peripheral area could have an impact of <br />approximately $400 million in cumulative property tax revenues from 2009 to 2080 and roughly <br />3,000 new jobs that could be ultimately absorbed upon full build-out of the area (assumed to occur <br />between 2050 and 2080). <br />3. The difference in estimated market valuation and property tax revenues grows at an <br />increasing rate over time between the two scenarios. <br />4. Peripheral impacts, as measured by a distance of approximately 2,000 feet from the base <br />of the fill area of the landfill, will be felt on an additional 200 acres of land area. These peripheral <br />impacts will result in potential lower valued development that is more likely to locate adjacent or <br />within view of a closed landfill. <br />The Landfill has some short-term financial benefits to the City because of the host fees paid to the <br />City. However, these monies will no longer be received by the City once the Landfill closes in 2033. <br />At that time, tax revenues generated by the expansion area will be minimal, and, as discussed in the <br />HKGi report, tax revenue generated from the surrounding areas will also be impacted. The HKGi <br />report states the expansion could cause a tax loss of approximately $400 million through 2080 and a <br />loss of 3,000 potential jobs. <br />Attachments <br />• Exhibit 1 -Location Map <br />• Exhibit 2 -Land Use Map from 2004 Comprehensive Plan <br />• Exhibit 3 -Elk River Landfill Application to amend Comprehensive Plan and rezone and <br />supporting documents <br />• Exhibit 4 - HKGi report dated June 2, 2009 <br />• Exhibit 5 -Environmental Report dated June 2, 2009, by Matt Ledvina, Landmark Environmental <br />• Exhibit 6 - HKGi presentation dated November 10, 2008 (North Highway 169 Land Use Study) <br />S:\PLANNING MAIN\Case Files\CUP\CU 09-12 Elk River Landfill Inc\Staff report to PC-CU 09-12.doc <br />