My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5.A. SR 05-04-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2009
>
05-04-2009
>
5.5.A. SR 05-04-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2009 10:19:01 AM
Creation date
5/1/2009 9:20:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/4/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~v-i~r~ad D~7ve Area ~nf artrtationa~ Page 4 <br />l~Ieeti~g Minutes <br />April 2~, ~~D9 <br />uestion~ auld you put ~ c~~l-de-sac an va.~s to totally e~tninate trucl~ traff is through that axea.~ <br />A~~werF That could be discussed with the pity cil to determir~.e if they~ould support that <br />change ~ traffic pattexns. Iith the cemetery ot~ Evans, it nay be possible to consider such a change <br />in the traffic routing, <br />uestio~i, Did the Deerfield 3r~ street recanstl~uctlon inch~desidewalks with the assessznetlt, acid <br />should we get a lower assessment because have no sidevv~l~s i~ our neighborhood? <br />A~isure~~ The Deerfield 3r~ pra~ect did ii~chide sldewalhs on some of the streets, The~were on~y on <br />one side of the street and ri~riy of the streets in the neighborhood lave na sided at ail, It has <br />al~ays been a City Council palicythat properties ~ the street recanstructian projects be assessed t a <br />same unit rate without regard to who has sidewalk, mho does not, or oth1'types of improvements <br />that may or inay not be z~ght ~ f runt of a particular property, <br />ueti~i~~ On railroad Dixve the city owns the street up to ~~ Street. Skio~~.d that part be <br />redone? <br />Ansv~e~: Railroad Dive, as you. low, has been blacl~ed off at Main Street for some period of~.ime, <br />although to the best of my ~~nawledge, that small section has never been vacated ~t currently is used <br />essentiallyto access the parking lot far the building at the coi~.er. ~ think maybe a better solution <br />would be to ultimately vacate the right- of -way and maintain an eas ein~rlt f or any ut' 'ties that run <br />tbraugh that area, <br />{~~estio~: ~s there any merit i changing I~ailraad Drive a ane~way~ <br />swerF Typically, when one-v~aystreets are used, there need to be an opposite dixyectian one~way <br />in close pra~t~sa that vehicles can n~al~e easy n1avements tkirouh the .rea, 'Tere is na such <br />rante adjacent to goad Drive <br />uest~a~: Does the futi planniiag of T~-I ~a and ~~9 play any role in whether or n.at the <br />streets should be reconstructed ~n our neighbarhood.~ <br />Answ~~: nIDOT f unding is e~treme~y limited and it ~s not lil~ely that there X11 be any <br />inxproveinents to either of these highways in tlae f areseeable future, <br />u~sti~~: Are there any local streets that the city taxi control 's use of the routes? <br />~x,.swe~; There are Cei~ain streets within the citytiiat utilize gas t2t~ fox' impraveinents and those <br />streets ~a.nnat be restricted to the use or nan`ue of certain types o~ vehicles, The city does have the <br />authority to control their local streets and identify routes f or trucl~ traff ic, wl~.e banning truck traffic <br />from. other neighborhood routes. <br />r~estiQ~~~ There is curb oxx the cul-de-sac of ~~~ StiPt, when the drainage caixies down frorri I~~ <br />Street to Evans and dawn Evans toward my property, a1i the drainage goes into my driveway and <br />causes damage, ghat can be done about thin <br />.A4tawei~: I axn avv°are of the drainage concerns at your property. ~ have been out there, along with the <br />Street Division a number a~ tiix~s over the year, The proposal to reconstruct the roads to an urban <br />style with canci~te curb and g~ittei~ and bx~nging piped storm drainage system into the neighborhood <br />would salve this problem permanently. 1 am not sure what hired of i~rnedial action could be taken at <br />this time without a project that would sufficientlysolve this issue, Our Street Division has been <br />v~orkirig on this problem f or number of yeaxs and has been l~.able to s aloe it with n7aintenailcey <br />type of solutians~ <br />ue~ti~n; It seems to nee that this will be a burden to payf or, but nay increase rnyprapeityvalue, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.