Laserfiche WebLink
In addition, some entities are discussing "buy in" to existing regional <br />transmission networks. Such responsible and innovative approaches to <br />securing adequate transfer capability should be supported arrd encouraged <br />as viable alternatives to RTOs. <br />FERC Enjoys Significant Authority to Address Remaining <br />Discrimination under the Current Order No. 888 GATT Regime <br />Under Order No. 838's GATT regime, FERC jurisdictional TOs are <br />obligated to provide transmission service on anon-discriminatory basis. <br />There are undoubtedly some instances where residual discrimination <br />still exists. Such discrimination can be addressed effectively, without <br />the complications that RTOs introduce, by focusing on clarifying and <br />enforcing open access rules. <br />With its shift in emphasis away from the Order No. 888 OAT'T <br />FERC Should undertake ~ regime in favor of RTO activities, FERC has relegated improvements <br />a ComprehenSlVe look to ir^s open access rules to case-by-case adjudication. FERC should <br />at Ways ItS Open undertake a comprehensive look at wa)s its open access regime <br />aCC@SS regime COUId could be improved through clearer Hiles or changes to improve <br />be ImprOVed through efficiency.2~ For example, lack of clarity or specificity with respect <br />to calculation and posting of A~°ailable Transmission Capacity <br />ClearerruleSOrChangBS ("ATC') has led to concerns by some APPA members about <br />t0 Improve efflClency. manipulation of ATC calculations. To date, FERC has chosen to <br />address these issues primarily on a case-by-case basis, rather than <br />making and enforcing rule changes to assure that calculations are <br />auditable and transparent. Similarly, protocols for processing transmission <br />reservation queues and procedures regarding the exercise of rollover <br />rights could use a fresh look. <br />(~oolnote continued fror7a ~ireaious gage) <br />power utilities jointly o~~n u-ansmission networks in states such as Georgia, <br />?Llichigan, Indiana, and iVlinnesota. Iu Vermont, the bulk transmission <br />system is jointly owned b}' rrr~rnicipal, cooperative, and investor-owned <br />utilities through Vermont F..lectric Transmission Company. In Wisconsin, <br />public power systems are permitted to invest up to their load ratio share <br />in ATC. See n. 1? above. <br />23 FERC Cornrnissioner Joseph Kelliher has suggested that Fl?KC consider <br />strengthening its Order No. 888 transmission rule, and that it review claims <br />of discrimination under that regime. "With RTO llevelopment Stalled, FERC <br />Shorild Beef Up Order 888, Kelliher Suggests," I~resideFERC, August 23, 2004, <br />at 1; "Kelliher: Eliminate Flaws in Open-Access Rule," Electric PouierDail~~, <br />Septernbcr 29, 2004, at 3. <br />Restructuring at the Crossroads: FERC Electric Policy Reconsidered 23 <br />