Laserfiche WebLink
Somewhere along the RTO-development road, the original business <br />purposes oCR"I'Os that FI?RC envisioned (to provide non-discriminatory <br />transmission service, eliminate transmission rate pancaking, <br />It iS tIInB t0 reOrlentRTOS ~ and provide a vehicle for joint planning and construction <br />towards their original miSSion• of transmission facilities-a11 for the benefit of electric <br />.providing adequate;. reliable.. consumers) morphed into a different mission and agenda. <br />Today, the "business" of RTOs appears to be to develop <br />and reasonably`priced regional <br />markets for every possible product, whether or not such <br />tranSRIISSion Service t0 bring markets are necessary, competitive and cost-effective, and <br />COSt SBVIngS tOCOnSllmerS. to serve the needs and desires of regulators and preferred <br />classes of stakeholders, rather than electric consumers. It is <br />time to reorient R"TOs towards their original mission: pro~nding adequate, <br />reliable and reasonably priced regional transmission service to bring cost <br />savings to consumers. <br />Ways to Advance Transmission Policv <br />Goals in Regions Without RTOs T <br />Because of regional differences, and the largely negative experiences <br />of their counterparts in RTO regions, many r1PPA members oppose <br />thc° expansion of RTOs to their own regions. The problems created by <br />the formation of RTOs have proven to be more significant than Ilrst <br />anticipated and the benefits have proven to be more elusive. These APPA <br />members believe there are more cost-effective means to provide open <br />access transmission and promote market efficiency in their regions. <br />F>/RC should abandon its "RTO-or nothing" approach to transmission <br />policy. Regional initiatives that enhance the efficiency of markets with <br />minimal added cost and risk should be encouraged and supported, <br />not discarded as inconsistent with FERC's SAID template. Regional <br />differences are real and have to be respected. Solutions tailored to <br />the needs of each region should be pursued that meet the goals set <br />forth in the Introduction to this ~~'IIITE I'.1PER. <br />FF.RC must also fully appreciate the deep and abiding concerns that <br />public power systems, especially those in the West, have about electric. <br />restructuring and RTO formation in the wake of the meltdown of <br />~~~'estern power markets in 2000. Many public po~~~er s}~stems are <br />skeptical that FLRC has the ability or the will to move quickly and <br />effectively to address abuses of market power, and protect consumers <br />froru paying unjust and unreasonable rates (or even to make them <br />whole later). Until these past problems are meaningfully resolved, <br />Restructuring at the Crossroads: FERC Electric Policy Reconsidered 19 <br />