Laserfiche WebLink
mime}' fot~ such projects (~,~ho ~ti-ill not. lend in the fuuzre without. long- <br />term commitments); not good for the econornv; and certainly' not good <br />for electric consumers. <br /> Wall Street has made it abundantly clear that financial institutions ~~~ill <br /> not again lend to generation project developers without assurances that <br /> such developers have long-term commitments oCsome sort. to support. <br /> their projccts.~' RTO features that impair the ability of utilities [o make <br /> such commiUnents must therefore be revisited and revamped. Physical <br /> transmission rights may be required to support conunitmenis to build or <br />The AChllleS buy from long-lived generation resources requiring substantial advance <br />heel Of the cornmitrnents. A~~hen L~~1P-based congestion pacing is used, it is imperative <br />LMP/FTR <br />that F1Rs of a term sufficient to hedge long-term supply and transmission <br />Systerll IS that arrangements be provided to those entering into such comrnitinents. <br />it, taken alone, <br />does not ensure There Must Be Meaningful Mechanisms to Get Adequate <br />construction Transmission Infrastructure Built in a Timely Fashion <br />of adequate The ~cltilles heel oC the I.'~ll'iFTP~ system described above is that it, <br />tranSnllSSion taken alone, does not ensure construction of adequate transmission <br />Infrastructure. ~nfrastructurc. [t does nothing to ensure that entities serving load in a <br /> region have access to a robust transmission svstern, and hence competing <br /> power supple options. ;ill the LMP/FTR system does is s1~rnv ~~'hich <br /> source/sink pairings create transmission congestion. While the tl~eorv <br /> is that this information will be sufficient for "the market" to spring into <br /> action, developing economically efficient solutions to such congestion, <br /> the reality can be much different.' <br />See, e. g., Transcript of FFRC technical Conference i^ Docket Nn. PL042-000, <br />February `2, 2004, at 8 (Statement of Lehman Brothers representative regarding <br />the strength of long-term conu~acts as evidence of credit~,~orthiness); Project <br />Finance '\e~~~s ~h'ire, :1ugt.ist 2004 issue at 5-13 report of proceedings of a <br />Chadbourne and Parke conference on the distressed generation project <br />market and the changed em~ironment for merchant generation, at which a <br />representative of Standard & Poor's stated: "The basic problem is ice have <br />in the po~~~er business a commodity business that requires large amoi.mts <br />of capital. It is a particularly tough commodity that. we all kno~+ cannot be <br />stored. The transmission and regulatory issues and lumpiness oFcapital are <br />particularly tough. That means long-term credit is absolutel~~ paramount."). <br />' David Bodek and S„ami ~'entakaraman, "hlakcover for California's Power <br />1v4arkets," Standa~zl f~'Poor's Ulrli.tzes ~~Pe~s/~edir~es,]ulp 5, 2004, Vol. I3, ~~o. 27, <br />at !~ (authors question whether C~~ISO's ~1D02 market redesign will in fact <br />spur nc~~- transmission incestrnent: "If MD02's ultimate aim is to ensure that <br />10 Restructuring at the Crossroads: FERC Electric Policy Reconsidered <br />