Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes <br />September 10, 2008 <br />--------------------------- <br />Page 3 <br />Commissioner Westberg concurred with Commissioners Staul and Westgaard. He asked <br />what impact the C2 zoning might have on the residential. NLr. Barnhart stated that staff has <br />not evaluated the impact, but that generally; commercial property is more expensive and is <br />more valuable. He suggested that the Planning Commission could recommend the Ciry <br />Council initiate an amendment could which would allow the use. He noted that if the use <br />were allowed as a conditional use permit, the neighbors would have an opportunity for <br />review and input. <br />Commissioner Austad concurred with the other Commissioners. He felt the business was <br />idea for the structure and the area. He was in favor of recommending another option, and <br />could not support the rezoning. Commissioner Lemke concurred, stating that he felt the <br />business would be well used. <br />Commissioner Scott asked for input from the applicant regarding the discussion. Ms. <br />Adams stated that she was comfortable with proceeding with an ordinance amendment. <br />Commissioner Staul stated he also was in favor of an ordinance amendment. <br />MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEMKE AND SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER SCOTT TO DENY THE REQUEST BY JANET ADAMS FOR <br />A REZONING TO C2, AND TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL <br />INITIATE AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW THE PROPOSED <br />USE. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br />5.2. Request by Anchor Sign for Conditional Use Permit to Amend Signage for Elk River <br />Crossing_(Dollar Tree, Public Hearing -Case No. CU 08-18 <br />Mr. Barnhart stated that Anchor Sign has requested an amendment to the Elk River <br />Crossing PUD agreement to allow signage on the north side of the Dollar Tree retail site. <br />He stated that staff does not support the request, since a great deal of thought was put into <br />the PUD standards, and the applicant has not demonstrated a need for the additional <br />signage. <br />Chair Westgaard opened the public hearing. <br />Joe Funderburk, representing Anchor Sign -stated that the current signage for Dollar <br />Tree is not visible from Highway 169. He presented photographs to support his position. <br />He stated that the proposed signage would be identical to what is on the front of the <br />building. Mr. Funderburk stated that the Game Stop and Taco Johns businesses have <br />signage on three sides, and the Tractor Supply has signage on the front and side of the <br />building. He stated the request would not set a precedent, since one has already been <br />established. Also, he noted that businesses one-third the size of Dollar Tree already have <br />much more signage. <br />There being no further comments, Chair Westgaard closed the public hearing. <br />Mr. Barnhart agreed that the PUD agreement has been changed several times to allow <br />additional signage. He stated that staff's recommendation is based on the fact the City <br />Council has taken the stance to keep to the original PUD plans. The original goal of limiting <br />the signage was to minimize impacts to the adjacent residential properties. He stated that <br />this is an example of how departing from the original plan can tend to snowball, and now <br />the request seems to fit in, since a precedent has already been established. <br />