My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7. PCSR 03-11-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2009
>
03-11-2009
>
7. PCSR 03-11-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2009 3:54:32 PM
Creation date
3/17/2009 3:41:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
3/11/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V. BOUNDARIES AND ACQUISITION COSTS <br />For this master plan, the proposed trail corridor is broken down into five segments that <br />illustrate the primary route and several alternative routes. It is proposed that if the <br />primary route cannot be constructed, the alternate routes will be considered; however, <br />most of the alternates are intended to be additional trail locations that will interconnect <br />with other existing and proposed trails. <br />Segment 1 -Appendix A, Sheets 1, 2 & 3 of 8 <br />The primary route forSegment 1 is approximately four miles in length. It begins <br />at the Anoka County/Sherburne County Line and ends at the west end of <br />Mississippi West Regional Park. This trail segment will include a 10 foot <br />bituminous trail south of and adjacent to the Highway 10 right-of-way until <br />Bowers Drive NW where it will then be routed through an agricultural field and <br />wooded area. From there it. will travel along the south side of 142"d Avenue <br />NW in the existing road right of way. This segment of trail will require <br />approximately 75,000 SF in trail easement acquisition at a cost of <br />approximately $175,000. Approximately 13,050 LF crosses agricultural fields <br />or open space. In these areas, Anoka County proposes that as the land is <br />developed, the trail could be required as part of the development with little cost <br />to the city or the county. <br />The proposed alternate for Segment 1 routes the trail through the agricultural <br />field and acts as an extension of Riverdale Drive. This could also serve as an <br />important connection to the existing trail along Riverdale Drive. With that <br />alternate, Riverdale Drive could have a trail along its entire length, which would <br />be very convenient and useful to that entire area after development. <br />Page 7 of 26 <br />,~ ~~ <br />C 15>b <br />SEG~~E6~T 1 -WEST <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.