My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-2009 CCM SP
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
02-17-2009 CCM SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2016 9:01:15 AM
Creation date
3/4/2009 2:42:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
2/17/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Coundl mutes <br />February 17, 2009 <br />Page <br />AUTHORIZING S'T'AFF TO SUBMIT AN APPLICAXION FOR A DNR LOCAL <br />TRMS CONNECTION GRANT. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br />ounce ber Motin questioned if there should be reference to the future extension of tile <br />trial to the cities of Ao a and mosey in the resolution. <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER GUMPHREY AND SECON-DED BY <br />COLYNCILMEMBER Z I WAS TO AMEND THEIR ORIGINAL MOTION TO <br />ADD LANGAUGE TO THE TSL GIANT RESOLUTION NOTING THAT <br />THE TIAL IS ALSO PROPOSED To CONNECT WITH THE CITIES of <br />ANOKA AND RAMSEY. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br />C.I. hIRDES Permit.1p date, Public earin- <br />Ms. Johnson presented the staff'' report. <br />Mayor Klin ng opened the public hearing. There bem' g no one to speak to this issue, Mayor <br />Klinzing closed the public hearing. <br />6. 2, Request by., `red McCoy., c o 's Pub for variance from the Shoreland Setback <br />Rezulations, and the I us Surface Regglations, Case No. V 09-01.,W-Pubfic H <br />Mr. Leeseberg presented the staff report. He noted that the Board of Adjustments and staff <br />both recommend denial of the variance request He reviewed the variance criteria outlined in <br />city ordinance. <br />Mayonmg opened the public hearing. <br />Fred McCoy, applicant — Stated his comments on this subject at a previous Council <br />meetng still stand.. He stated he meets the hardship criteria because patrons leave his <br />business when they fund out his restaurant doesn't have an outdoor patio. He further stated <br />it is a hardship for the downtown business community when patrons don't cone to visit his <br />restaurant. He stated having the patio will help to crag more business to the downtown <br />business coeur, <br />Mr. McCoy requested an explanation of Condition Number I in the staff report regarding a <br />tormwater retention plan and whether he would be required to put in a drainage pond. He <br />noted this could be a cost concern. <br />Mr. Maurer stated the city has not revved any uuy developed older areas of town to fidly <br />meet the new storm surer policies when they're expanding properties, <br />He stated the theory used is that % of the stor water goes directly to the river through <br />the storm sewer system and questioned the benefit of having the 1% of runoff fully <br />managed when there generally is a big negative to the property to ,rewire them to meet the <br />storm severer policies. He noted it would be unreasonable to hold drainage on this property. <br />He stated the city would require erosion protection while work is being done In order to <br />protect the bluff He stated the property would reed to be re-established in order to prevent <br />ture erosion problems. <br />Mayor I<Iinzing closed the public heaning. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.