Laserfiche WebLink
Benefit Cost Analysis <br /> <br />Parsons-Brinckerhoff (1998) <br /> <br />· Comparative analysis of 6 proposed rail routes <br /> <br />· Northstar route analyzed was 41 miles long <br /> (only 50 percent of current proposed route) <br /> <br />· 15-year horizon <br /> <br />· Northstar was best-scoring alternative <br /> <br /> Benefit / cost ratio = 0.26 <br /> <br />Anton, Lubov & Associates, Inc <br /> <br />Benefit Cost Analysis <br /> <br />MnDOT (2002) <br /> <br />· Based on 30% of engineering completed <br /> <br />· Analyzed 82-mile route, adding to cost <br /> <br />· Used ridership forecast based on full corridor <br /> <br />· Added in value of capital stock after 15 years <br /> <br /> Benefit / cost ratio = 0.84 <br /> <br />Anton, Lubov & Associates, Inc <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />