My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6. SR 05-06-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1996
>
05/06/1996
>
5.6. SR 05-06-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:18 AM
Creation date
3/12/2003 8:18:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/6/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
consider "loaning" youth hockey this money with an understanding that they <br />will repay this $50,000 to the city over the next five years. Youth hockey <br />can't pay this money now due to their commitment for various components of <br />the project as noted above. Accordingly, the city may have to come up with <br />$100,000 for this project if it is to "loan" youth hockey $50,000 and make its <br />$50,000 contribution. <br /> <br />The two sources of city funds for this project that I know of are the RDF <br />contributions and the liquor store reserves. The RDF contributions are <br />currently being used for the purchase of the Cass property, but we expect this <br />money to be recaptured in a year or so. This doesn't help us too much when <br />we need the money in 1996 for the contractors. The liquor store funds are <br />available, but using $100,000 for this project may delay the construction of a <br />second liquor store. (Based on our meeting with the liquor store architect and <br />his cost estimates for a new store, the project, from a financial point of view, <br />may have to be delayed a year regardless of this ice arena financial <br />commitment.) <br /> <br />RSP, Mortenson, and I.C.E. have all reviewed and analyzed the ice arena <br />bids. Please see the attached material from Mortenson and I.C.E. regarding <br />the low responsible bidders for this project. Staff concurs with the <br />recommendations as outlined in the attached material. Staff recommends <br />approval of these bids contingent upon the banks making a commitment to <br />the $2.1 million amount at a competitive interest rate. <br /> <br />The timeframe for this project calls for substantial completion 215 days after <br />awarding the bids and signing the contracts. This puts substantial <br />completion into early December, so it is imperative to have this project move <br />forward as soon as possible in order to facilitate the obtaining of ice rental <br />contracts. <br /> <br />In working on this project over the past few years, a number of adjustments <br />and changes have happened with the project. This has necessitated <br />additional work from the architects. This additional work was requested by <br />the Task Force and the Task Force is recommending approval of the RSP <br />change order as outlined in the attached material. The Council has been <br />aware that RSP helped with the submission of the Mighty Ducks grant <br />application and this is one part of the change order. Another part of the <br />change order is the design development changes that were requested by the <br />Task Force. The final, and biggest, part of the change order relates to the <br />fact that the project was simply too expensive as originally designed and this <br />did not become apparent until after the construction plans had developed to a <br />certain stage. Once this became apparent, the Task Force ordered the size of <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.