My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.10. 7.11. 7.12. SR 06-19-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
06-19-1995
>
7.10. 7.11. 7.12. SR 06-19-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2008 4:20:48 PM
Creation date
10/27/2008 4:20:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/26/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Steve Ach <br />May 18, 1995 <br />a Page Four <br />of the building home sites with the natural topography of the azea. This <br />should lend itself. to the ability to save many trees in the rear of each <br />property. We would also note that, in our meetings with the Developer, he <br />has indicated that the grading process will individually mazk trees in the <br />fronts of lots that can be saved. In areas of little or no cut or fill activities, <br />large specimen trees would be noted for saving, even ones that would <br />require small retaining walls'. or other measures to protect them and blend <br />them into the fmal product. <br />^ The City ordinance sets the maximum street grade at 8%. There are several <br />locations, specifically in the northern part of this development, where <br />proposed street grades exceed this maximum slope. However, there aze <br />other items that we believe the City should balance in reviewing these areas. <br />Those would be the layout of the lot relative to the natural topography and <br />the vegetation. We can certainly envision a situation where an 8% street <br />grade could be exceeded if there are benefits such as saving substantial <br />stands of significant trees. In reviewing such an issue, we would look at the <br />amount of traffic, the ability to provide a flat area for stopping, the ability <br />for the Street Department to keep the azea clear of ice and snow during the <br />. winter months, and the site distances provided through these types of <br />vertical curves. In order to make a final determination on the specific issues <br />relative to this plat, we would recommend that the Developer supply <br />additional information such as street profiles, cross-sections, and other <br />information which would support his position for asking for deviation from <br />the maximum street grade. <br />^ No storm drainage calculations have been provided at this point in time. <br />The concept of storm drainage laid out on the Preliminary Grading Plan <br />provides for collection of runoff with a small diameter storm sewer system <br />and depositing it into various lowlands. These ponding areas would have <br />no outlet; therefore, they will need to be designed for a worse case scenario. <br />Also, sedimentation ponds will need to be provided prior to any areas <br />proposed to discharge to desugnated wetlands. <br />^ There are several areas on !the Grading Plan where contours are either <br />missing or mislabeled. These need to be corrected in future submittals. <br />^ As this project moves forward and more specific drawings are provided for <br />the first phase, we would recammend that the City require the Grading and <br />Development Plans be prepared at a lazger scale. It is very difficult to do <br />. a detailed review of this type of area at such a small scale. <br />230/758-1802.may <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.