My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.4. & 6.5. SR 04-16-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
04/16/2001
>
6.4. & 6.5. SR 04-16-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:13 AM
Creation date
2/5/2003 8:49:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/16/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of that project abandoning it if Alternative A-1 is to be adopted. If <br />Alternative A-2 (or some variation of it) is adopted, it will also be <br />important to replat the project using smaller, sewered lots. <br /> <br />County Fairgrounds <br /> <br />The City should encourage Sherburne County to relocate its fairgrounds <br />out of the City at the earliest possible date so that better use can be made <br />of that site (and surrounding properties) and so that the City can recoup <br />its full investment in utility and road improvements. <br /> <br />Park System Expansion <br /> <br />Major additions to the City park system have been suggested by the <br />Alternatives to serve this neighborhood and the'City at large. The only <br />sure and equitable way to obtain the planned park sites is for the City to <br />buy them; it is very unlikely that such tracts can be acquired through <br />dedication as part of a plat, particularly the major riverfront open space <br />and park in the floodplain. Therefore, if this plan is adopted by the City <br />Council, the City Parks Commission should initiate discussions with lan- <br />downers and work with the rest of the community to build support for <br />this major undertaking. <br /> <br />Combining Properties <br /> <br />In designing Alternatives A-1 and A-2, attempts were made to avoid <br />splitting ownership parcels and to avoid suggesting that various owners <br />combine or sell their parcels to a common developer. However, the <br />results of a long history of land parcelization are not always conducive to <br />the best urban design and land marketing. Therefore, there may be <br />instances where ownership patterns should change. The City may assist <br />in this although it is best if such arrangements can be made entirely pri- <br />vately. · ~ <br /> <br />] <br /> <br />52 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.