Laserfiche WebLink
I. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />In October 2002, Elk River City Council adopted the Pavement Rehabilitation Report <br />prepared by Howard R. Green Company. The Report outlined the standards and project <br />area for the reconstruction of the streets within the Old Core City. It was determined that <br />Fourth Street from Main Street to Trunk Highway (TH) 10 and additional side streets <br />should be included in the first proposed project scheduled for construction in 2003. The <br />area to be included in the first project is shown in Exhibit '1. <br /> <br />After adoption of the Pavement Rehabilitation Report, the Elk River City Council <br />directed Howard R. Green Company to prepare a Feasibility Study for the 2003 <br />Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements. <br /> <br />The proposed 2003 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements includes the reconstruction <br />of roads, sidewalks, storm drainage improvements, and watermain improvements. The <br />major components of the proposed project include the reconstruction of the following <br />streets: <br /> <br />Street From To <br />Fourth Street Main Street TH 10 <br />Rush Avenue Fourth Street Fifth Street <br />Quinn Avenue Fourth Street Fifth Street <br />Oxford Avenue Fourth Street Fifth Street <br />Norfolk Avenue Fourth Street Main Street <br />Morton Avenue TH 10 Main Street <br /> <br />II. PROJECT SCOPE <br /> <br />The purpose of this study is to analyze the reconstruction of the proposed streets <br />included in the 2003 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements. In addition, existing <br />sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer systems will be evaluated and necessary <br />improvements proposed. The study will discuss the existing conditions, proposed <br />improvements, estimated construction costs, and overhead costs which include city <br />administration, engineering, fiscal, and legal expenses. The Pavement Rehabilitation <br />Report prepared by Howard R. Green and adopted by the City Council in October 2002 <br />will be used as a guideline to discuss financing methods for the proposed improvements. <br /> <br />III. NECESSITY AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS <br /> <br />The improvements proposed in this study are necessary for a number of reasons. The <br />reconstruction of the streets is a cost-effective means of continuing the City's proactive <br />street efforts and ensuring an adequate means of transportation for the residents. In <br />addition to rehabilitating street pavement, a total street reconstruction will allow for <br />correction of existing drainage problems through the construction of concrete curb and <br />gutter, modifying street grades, and the installation of a storm sewer collection system <br />as needed. Watermain improvements are necessary due to under sized mains, which <br />result in inadequate water flow. <br /> <br /> <br />