Laserfiche WebLink
Barbara and David Burandt <br />19118 Tyler Street NW <br />Elk River, MN 55330-1928 <br />April 11, 2008 <br />Terry Mauer <br />Public Works Director <br />City of Elk River <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br />Dear Mr. Mauer: <br />David and I are writing to you in order to reach an agreement regarding payment for the temporary <br />easement onto our land that will result from the construction of the extension of 193rd Avenue. <br />In talking to you, David and I were under the impression that we would be discussing the monetary <br />value of the temporary easement sometime this year, in fate winter or spring. On one of the visits you <br />made to our house last fall, you told us that the City's attorney would be working with the three land <br />owners that the city would be purchasing land from. You, indicated, however, that you would be <br />working with David and I to come to an agreement regarding the temporary easement. <br />We were very surprised when some weeks ago, we received a contract in the mail to be signed and <br />returned to John Anderson, Engineer. The payment for the temporary easement was "in consideration <br />of the sum of $1.00, and other good and valuable consideration." We, of course, called Mr. Anderson, <br />questioning the amount to be paid for the easement. In a follow-up letter we received from Mr. <br />Anderson, he wrote that "it was our understanding going into this process that your primary goal was to <br />work with the City staff through the design to insure you were in agreement with the details:' He goes <br />on to state, "the staff incorporated many of your specific requests into the design of the plans." The <br />implication in this letter is that we agreed to trade involvement in the planning process for <br />remuneration for our property. That was never our understanding. As with any activity that involves <br />more than one party, discussion to seek agreement is a necessary part of the process. But we never <br />imagined that mutual participation in a project would be considered to be in lieu of monetary payment <br />for the temporary easement. <br />The land to be taken for the temporary easement amounts to approximately 0.25 acres for a period of <br />36 months. The land is zoned "city water and sewer". We expect remuneration that would be <br />considered by the courts to be "fair" to both the city and the landowner. <br />We offer you two options for consideration by the city. They are <br />1. Settlement: $10,000 for a temporary easement for 0.25 acres/36 months; <br />2. Alternative: Have two land appraisals completed. One by an appraiser who would <br />represent the city and one by an appraiser who would represent the owner. If you are <br />