9.1. SR 06-02-2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

193' :AvcvuC Coai~or Update t'age ~ ~unc 2, 2008 before the final cost detexnnnation for the acdiusition of diesc four properties is complete. All other properties needed for the project have been secured with one exception. Attached to this- memo for your consideration is a letter from NIr. and Mrs. Burandt. As the City Council directed some dine ago, we have worked closely with the Rurandts to mitigate and ininitnizc impacts to their property. The adjustments we hate made nzclude a slight change nx the alignment of the road to move it further away from their property line, the addition of a chain link fence along the majority of the length where the road is in close pxo~imity to their property line, and adjustments to the wetland culvert system to add extra protection to the portion of the wetland nn their property. We have reduced the impact to their property to an area .25 acres on a temporary basis fox giadulg purposes. As you can see from the letter submitted by Mr. and 'Vars. Burandt, they axe requestuig a x'10,000 payment fox the temporary casement of .25 acres. I have briefly discussed with t~4rs. Burandt the potential of providing them an offsetting piece of property, once the road project is complete. The city has acquired more property than is needed fox the road improvement from the Maas property in order to grade a steep hill. Once the lidl is graded, a portion of that property could he turned over to the Buxandts, hi fact, the Burandt fence line is slightly off of their pmpeity on the Maas property (now city propertf~). By providing them a small sliver of land when the project is complete, thciz fence would be back on the property that they would own. I have kept nc~ Burandts informed when this issue would be discussed by the Council and I do expect that they wilt be in attendance. D. Plans and Specifications There are a few items that I want to touch on with the Council relative to the plans and specifications before they axe subnritted to MnDO'T' for final approval. 'T'hese include: 1. Sanitax~sewex and water extensions BxVan Adams of the N'lk River Municipal Utilities would like to see water e_xtendcd under 193` Avenue to provide a needed loop in the water system from the properties developed south of CS[~H '13 to the areas north along 1'H 169. VJe believe that this is a reasonable route far looping of the watcrmain system. A portion of die 193`s Avenue new corridor is within the city's sanitary sewer district All land lying west of Tyler Street is in the Urban Sexvicc llisttict, while lands east of Tyler Street axe not. Flowever, the only sizable piece of property with future development potential, without piecing several paecels together, would be the Burandt property. Phis could be serviced in the future should it develop by extending sewer from Twrrr Lakes Estates just south of CSAH 13 at Tyler Street northward along "Tyler to service the Burandt property. If we were to put sanitary sewer under 193"' ilvenue with the road extension, it could rin n out to be a very expensive insurance policy which may never be needed. My recommendation would be to allow the water extension for looping of the Ctiliry's water system, but nor extend I'rr~inm_]m~ ocPrrrjA2008 Impcocemet~t 1 roject~A193~d -Ace CorridorVOG 0? 08 cc memo.doc