2.0. SR 05-19-2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

5. Peggy Kaproth, Parcel Identification Number 75-409-0635 Ms. Kaproth indicated that this is a vacant lot that she purchased at auction. She stated that the 42% increase in market value is excessive. Mr. Olson explained that he reassessed all of the properties on the river in that area. He admitted he had trouble with figuring out a land scheme because the lots had been underassessed in previous years. Councihnember Gumphxev questioned why an increase in value of a property that has been underassessed is not spread out over a couple years. Mx. Olson explained that he cannot ethically spread it out. He noted that the value is not raised simply because it has been underassessed but because that is what it is worth. Mayor Klinzing questioned if the lot can be reviewed to evaluate its condition. Mr. Olson indicated he will review the property and report back to the board at the reconvene meeting. 6. Kenneth Dehn, Parcel Identification Number 75-733-0210 and 75-733-0215 Mr. Dehn submitted a letter appealing his market value. He explained that his business is currently closed and has no tenants and he would like a reassessment. Mx. Cullen indicated he will reassess the property and report back at the reconvene meeting. Jeffrey Day, Parcel Identification Number 75-523-0230 Mx. Day submitted a letter appealing his market value. The property will be reassessed and the appraiser will report back at the next meeting. 8. Mark Pendergast, Penmar Properties, Parcel Idendfication Numbers 75-133-1115 and 75-133- 1100 (Elk Crossing, LLC) Mr. Riley presented a letter from Mr. Pendergast appealing his values on the above mentioned apartment buildings. Mx. Riley explained that the appraisers were not able to review the properties until yesterday. He stated that he would recommend this item be continued to the reconvene meeting so the owner has time to respond to the rental data survey that has been sent out. 5:AAdmirilsceadonABoaxd of Appeal\7A08 Reconvene CC Memo.doc