5.4. SR 05-19-2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Case Pilo CU 0&OR Page 3 Aoolicable Regulations Conditional Use Permit J&B Mining Conditional Use Pemut The issuance of a Conditional Use Permit can be ordered only if the use at the ptoposed location: 7. Widl not endanger, injure or detrimentally affect the use and enjoyment of otherproperty in the immediate vicinity or the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience orgeneral welfare of the neighborhood or the city. 2. Will be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant proper y. 4. Will be served adequately by and will not adversely affect essential public facik'ties and services including streets, police and fare protection, drainage, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, parks and schools; and will not, fn particular, create traffic congestion or inte~rence with traffic on adjacent and neighboring public thoroughfares. 5. Will not involve uses, activities, processe ,materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons arpmperty because of excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, dust or vibrations. 6. Will not result In the destruction, lost ar damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. 7. Will fully comply with all other requirzments of this Code, including any applicable requirements and standards for the issuance of a license or permit to establish and operate the proposed use in the city. If denial of such a pettnit should occur, it shall accompany recommendations ox determinations by findings ox a report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in Section 30-654. In the review of the standards fox CUP as outlined, it appears that the request is consistent with all of these standards, provided the conditions axe applied without reduction. Analysis The applicant wishes to begin training the property again, and is requesting approval of the original 2004 application. Main issues raised during the original review included transportation routes and wetland impacts. Transportation Transportation routes: Material excavated ox otherwise removed from the site will follow one of two paths to Highway 169. Trucks will access either 219`" or 217x'. A map of the proposed haul routes is attached. Wetland As part of the original review and approval, there were impacts ptoposed to 85,294 square feet of wetland. With mitigation ratio requirements at 2:1, 170,588 square feet (3.91 acxes)of wetlands were