Laserfiche WebLink
COMPARISON OF NEW START COST EFFECTIVENESS FOR SELECTED PROJECTS <br /> <br /> INCREMENTAL COST PER <br /> INCREMENTAL PASSENGER <br /> TOTAL CAPITAL SECTION 5309 SECTION 5309 SHARE New Start vs. OVERALL PROJECT <br />PROJECT COSTS (Millions) FUNDING (Millions) OF CAPITAL COST No-Build ~ TSM RATING <br />Northstar MPLSto Rice (Preliminary) $ 231.0 $ 116.0 50% $ 9.84 $ 13.60 NA <br />Dallas-Ft. Worth TRE Phase 2 $ 160.6 $ 62.4 39% $ 4.60 $ 9.80 Recommended <br />Ft. Lauderdale Tri-County Commuter Rail $ 327.0 $ 110.5 34% $ 13.80 N,~ Recommended <br />Newark-Elizabeth Rail Link $ 207.7 $ 142.0 68% $ 8.80 N,~ Highly Recommended <br />San Diego Mission Valley East $ 431.0 $ 330.0 77% $ 10.40 NA Highly Recommended <br />Chicago Central Kane Corridor $ 93.0 $ 54.3 62% $ 13.70 $ 16.80 Recommended <br />Minneapolis Hiawatha Avenue $ 548.6 $ 274.3 50% $ 19.00 $ 19.20 Recommended <br />Orange County - Centerline $ 2,015.8 $ 1,009.1 50% $ 6.80 $ 11.90 Recommended <br />Chicago Metra SW Corridor Commuter Rail $ 165.5 $ 103.9 63% $ 8.90 $ 8.60 Highly Recommended <br />San Diego (Oceanside Escondido Rail) $ 235.5 $ 152.1 60% $ 4.40 $ 6.40 Highly Recommended <br /> <br />SOURCE: FTA Summary of FY 2001 New Starts Ratings <br /> <br />NewStart Comparison - 012401 .xls <br /> <br /> <br />