Laserfiche WebLink
CBD Project <br />January 22, 2001 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br />1988 PROJECT <br /> <br />In 1988 the downtown streetscape project took place. Costs that were above <br />and beyond a normal sidewalk and lighting project were assessed out to the <br />benefited property owners in the downtown area. In this regard, extra costs for <br />lights, tree grates, trash receptacles, and textured sidewalk were assessed. <br /> <br />The assessment from the 1988 streetscape project shows that lights were 55%, <br />tree grates 25%, trash receptacles 10%, and sidewalk 10% of the total. <br />Accordingly, assessments for sidewalks were a small part of the streetscape <br />assessments. The attached 4/4/88 minutes show the breakdown of the costs <br />that were assessed out thirteen years ago. <br /> <br />In 1988, the textured sidewalk was 22.5% more than a concrete sidewalk. With <br />this proposed project in 2001, the construction of a paver sidewalk is about <br />58% more than a fiat gray concrete sidewalk. If you think that a fiat gray <br />sidewalk would never happen, then it should be noted that the solid paver <br />design is 35% higher than the next cheapest sidewalk option, which <br />incorporates pavers only at the intersections. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />As there was no clearly understood consensus from the 10/23 or 11/27 <br />meetings, we are again going to try to reach an understanding on a sidewalk <br />program for 2001. The central business district property owners and the <br />Chamber of Commerce have been notified of this meeting and the developer <br />will be providing examples of the paver products and the sidewalk designs. All <br />Councilmembers are encouraged to come to the HRA meeting to see the <br />presentations and to hear citizen input. Ail HRA and Councilmembers are <br />also encouraged to see the paver examples that are in the driveway and <br />sidewalk of the Plaisted office at County Road 33 and Highway 169. <br /> <br />Goals for the meeting include reaching a consensus on: 1) the type of sidewalk, <br />2) the design of the sidewalk, and 3) who is to pay what for the sidewalk. <br />Whatever is agreed to needs final City Council approval as the sidewalk is in <br />the public right-of-way. <br /> <br />Staff recommends that there be one look throughout downtown and that this <br />look be the Cobblestone paver (random pattern). Staff further recommends, <br />but to a lesser degree, that the Cobblestone be a 100% install. Finally, it <br />should be noted that funds are available over the next 4-5 years to finance <br />whatever share of the project the HRA wants to assume. <br /> s: \ eda \ hra \ cbdwalks.doc <br /> <br /> <br />