FY 1998
<br />
<br /> .p_o_ p_u Lati_o n . _% Served
<br />~ik River 1_4,0_1_9 ..... 59%
<br />Otsego . _5 ;.2_ 7_1 ..... 22%
<br />Hassan 2_,_100_ 9%
<br /> 1 700 7%
<br />R~gers _._
<br /> 814 3%
<br />Dayton .........
<br /> O%
<br />
<br />Netlncome/Loss Per Capita ProfWLoss
<br />-$14,379.29 -$8,433.03
<br />-$14,379.29 -$3,170.73
<br />
<br />-$14,379.29 -$1,263.24
<br />-$14,379.29 -$1,022.62
<br />
<br />-$14,379.29 -$489.66
<br />
<br />$0.00 $0.00
<br />
<br />Zimmerman
<br />TOTALS =
<br />
<br />0% $0.00 $0.00
<br />
<br />2-3,'9-O4 ..... 100% -$14,379 29 -$14.379.29
<br />
<br />Elk River
<br />Otsego
<br />
<br /> FY 1999 '-
<br />Population % Se~ed , Net Income/Loss Per Capita ProfWLoss
<br />~,~01 59% $3,730.34 $2,209.07
<br />5,600 22% $3,730.34 $808.50
<br />
<br />Hassan
<br /> .... 4,042
<br />
<br />16% $3,730.34 $583.56
<br />
<br />Dayton
<br />Livonia
<br />Zimmerman
<br />
<br />895 3% $3,730.34 $129.21
<br /> 0% $0.00 $0.00
<br /> 0% $0.00 $0.00
<br />
<br />~-~A~ 25,838 100% $3,730.34 $3,730.34
<br />
<br /> River
<br />Otsego
<br />Hassan
<br />
<br />Population
<br />
<br />% Served I Net Income/Loss Per Capita Profit/Loss
<br />
<br /> , 16,888 I 61% I $11,204.84 . $6,811.39
<br /> 5,600 20% ' $11,204.84 $2 258.63
<br />
<br />_Rogers 4,398 16% ! $11,204.84 $1,773.83
<br />Dayton 895 3% ! $11 204.84 $360.98
<br />Livonia 0% I $0.00 $0.00
<br />Zimmerman 0% $0.00 $0.00
<br />-rr-,-r~.~ 27 781 I 100% i $11,204.84 $11,204.84
<br />
<br />E~'RI~ER'To~'', '*:$~4,31i.26 ~ -$67,274.40 ! 51%
<br />
<br />OSTEGO TOTAL
<br />
<br />HASSANTOTAL
<br />
<br />-$12,830.28 I -$67,274.40 ~ 19%
<br />-$5,602.50 i -$67,274.40 ~ 8%
<br />
<br />ROGER_S.. TO_ T__A~__.- -$2,489.96 I -$67,274.40 ~ 4%
<br />
<br />DAYTONTOTAL : -$1,994.56 ; -$67,274.40 i 3%
<br />
<br />_LIVONIATOT_AL ..... -$5,934.47 i -$67,274.40 I 9%
<br />ZIMMERMANTOTA -$4 111.36 i -$67,274.40 I 6%
<br /> -$67,274.39 , -$67~274.40 I 100%
<br />
<br />
<br />
|