5.6. PCSR 05-09-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Case File: CU OG-12 Page 3 SeDtlc SYStem At the staff site plan review meeting the condition of the existing septic system was questioned. A request of that meeting was the applicant obtains a compliance inspection of the existing system. The inspection came back as a failing system. The applicant then had a plan designed to bring the system into compliance. Also requested was that a secondary site be indicated on the site plan. Staff contacted the licensed septic designer to clarify the ability to provide a second site. It was conformed that a second site is not possible on this site. The designer did indicate that if there were to be any future problems with newly updated system, a new tank could be added and the existing drain field could be dug up and then a pressure bed added. Staff from the Building Division also stated that the current system could have amonitoring/alarm system put in place to monitor the system to prevent future problems. Parking and Circulation The site provides 39 parking stalls with most of the parking stalls being located outside of the property line within the service road. This parking situation within the service road is common with other properties within the area. Staff recommends that if the furthest east stalls are not needed for the facility that they should be removed. Landscaping Due to the total amount of paving, retention ponds and septic areas no new landscaping is being proposed. Standards for Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit (Section 30-654) The issuance of a Conditional Use Permit can be ordered only if the use at the proposed location: 7. mill not endanger, injure or detrimentally affect the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity or the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience orgeneral welfare of the neighborhood or the city. 2. Will be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. Wlill not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property. 4. lPlill be served adequately by and will not adversely a~ect essential public facilities and services including streets, police and fzre protection, drainage, refuse disposal, water and leaver systems, parks and schools; and will not, in particular, create tra~zc congestion or interference with ytraffic on adjacent and neighboringpublic thoroughfares. 5. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons orproperty because of excessive traffzc, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, dust or vibrations. 6. Dill not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. 5:\PLANNING\Case Files\2006\CUP\CU OG-12 Wells\CU 06-12_PC.doc