5. HRSR 11-05-2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Minutes October 8, 2007 Page 4 Councilmember Farber stated that the study was flawed from the beginning because of the timing and because information was left out of the study. Councilmember Farber indicated the study contains good recommendations and should be accepted but the city should continue to conduct its own counts. He noted in accepting the study, he would like to acknowledge that it is flawed. Councilmember Gumphrey questioned if a firm would be hired to conduct the additional traffic counts. Councilmember Farber indicated that he would like staff to conduct the counts because he is not satisfied with the firm that conducted the parking study. Councilmember Gumphrey agreed that staff should conduct the parking counts. Councilmember Zerwas stated that he is in favor of accepting the study, specifically the recommendations called for in the study, requesting that it be treated as a baseline and reevaluated quarterly. He stated that during those quarterly reevaluations, he would like to see parking data collected over a three day period. He noted that he also does not believe the study is an accurate representation of what the future will be in downtown but he is not in favor of accepting the entire study as flawed. MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER FARBER AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS TO ACCEPT THE DOWNTOWN PARKING STUDY BY CARL WALKER, INC. WITH ALL OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE STUDY; FOR THE STUDY TO BE TREATED AS A BASELINE AND REEVALUATED QUARTERLY; FOR QUARTERLY PARKING COUNTS TO BE CONDUCTED BY STAFF OVER A THREE DAY PERIOD AND BROUGHT BACK TO THE COUNCIL; AND ACKNOWLEDGING THE PARKING COUNT PORTION OF THE STUDY IS INACCURATE. MOTION CARRIED 4-1. Councilmember Moon opposed. Councilmember Motin noted that he did not vote in favor to accept the study because he does not believe the language in the motion should include that the study is inaccurate. He believes that the information is incorrect as it is expected to be in the future but is correct as of the date the study was conducted. He explained that he does not believe the study can be used as a marketing tool if the Council acknowledges it as inaccurate or flawed. Ms. Johnson indicated that staff will come back to the Council with recommendations for methodology on conducting and implementing parking counts. Parking Permits Chief of Police Jeffrey Beahen indicated that Public Works Director Terry Maurer, Community Development Director Scott Clark, Street Superintendent Phil Hals, and he met to discuss the parking permit process as it relates to the downtown businesses, specifically the permitted uses of the King Avenue lot. Chief Beahen stated that the consensus of the group was that they do not support putting employees, residential and visiting parking, and customer parking all in the King Avenue lot. Chief Beahen reviewed issues relating to permitting, signage, snow removal, safety, multiple uses in the lot, and enforcement as outlined in his staff report. Chief Beahen reviewed staffs recommendation as follows: ^ Employee parking -keep in the King Avenue parking lot with permits issued at a low or nominal fee. These permits would be issued knowing that with approximately 156