My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 11-19-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
11/19/2007
>
6.2. SR 11-19-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:11 AM
Creation date
11/16/2007 10:51:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/19/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 2 <br />SUMMARY OF MODELED LOADINGS GENERATED IN EROS <br /> TP Load' <br />(Ibs/yr) TSS Load <br />i (Ibs/ r} ": Runoff Volume :! <br />(ac-ft/ r} <br />Baseline Condition 1,230 440,600 1,050 <br />Present Condition 1,920 678,600 1,740 <br />2020 Condition w/o infiltration 2,230 772,700 2,000 <br />2020 Condition w/infiltration 450 54,100 400 <br />The results presented in the table above are based on the assumption that 80% volume reduction implies <br />80% phosphorus reduction (though greater than 80% removal likely occurs) and 93% 755 reduction. <br />Application of the 0.5-inch infiltration requirement is adequate to meet Baseline conditions far all three <br />parameters based on this example. <br />It is also possible to consider the decrease in load by a runoff depth comparison between agricultural land <br />use and urban residential land use. <br />0.14 Rv Agriculture * 31.5 inches average annual precipitation = 4.4 inches/year <br />0.21 Rv Urban residential * 31.5 inches average annual precipitation = 6.6 inches/year <br />6.6 inches/year' 20%= 1.3 inches/year <br />This simple calculation shows that the runoff depth for urban residential with implementation of the <br />infiltration requirement is considerably less than the runoff depth generated with agricultural land use. <br />City staff and the City Council will consider whether an adjustment is needed to the infiltration requirement <br />to meet nondegradation requirements. Structural and non-structural BMPs developed as a part of BMP <br />summary sheet 5a-1 should be designed to meet the infiltration requirement. <br />To address the need for a citywide infiltration requirement, the City of Elk River proposes BMP 5d-1, <br />implementation of the citywide infiltration ordinance. <br />IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WITH PUBLIC PROJECTS <br />Another means of attaining nondegradation compliance is for the City to begin retrofitting BMPs to areas <br />through routine and periodic public improvement projects such as street reconstruction, park and other <br />public facilities projects. In the case of street reconstruction projects very often these are mill and overlay <br />and not full reconstruction projects. Nonetheless, some opportunities might present themselves for <br />retrofitting different BMPs depending on the specifics of each project. A potential annual load reduction <br />would be speculative if offered now. Rather, the BMP summary sheet for this SWPPP modification <br />emphasizes adaptive management through experience and reporting through the annual reporting required <br />by the permit. <br />To address the need for retrofitting BMPs, the City of Elk River proposes BMP Sf-1, implementation of BMPs <br />with public projects. <br />Elk River 1482-07001 <br />Nondegradatlon Report Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.