My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 08-20-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
08/20/2007
>
6.2. SR 08-20-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:05 AM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:09:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
giver <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Redevelopment Framewprk Task Force <br />CC: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Scott Clark, Community Development Director <br />DATE: August 13, 2007 I~I <br />SUBJECT: Highway 10 Discussion <br />Attachments <br />• Revised Pages 30, 31 and 33 of Draft Plan <br />• Elevated Roadway Image <br />• Depressed Roadway Image <br />• "As-Is" Roadway Image <br />Issue <br />Based on direction from the City Council (see',attached minutes dated July 9, 2007) the Task <br />Force was asked to reconsider their initial recommendation of eliminating the Main Street <br />crossing at Highway 10 on the Illustrative Master Plan. Also attached are the minutes from <br />the Task Force's meeting of March 5, 2007 w ere the subject of Highway 10 was originally <br />discussed. From a recommendation standpoint there appears to be .four design options: <br />1) Keep Jackson Avenue and Main Street "as is" (on-grade). Attachment I. <br />2) Eliminate one of the aforementioned streets per the original recommendation. <br />3) Elevate the roadway as shown on attachment II. <br />4) Depress the roadway as show on 1?,~ttachment III. <br />As described on the attached "Roadway Desi~n Option "(from page 31 of the first approved <br />Draft Plan each option carries with it a series of advantages and disadvantages. Part of the <br />reason for these difficulties is the need for balancing the needs and objectives of MnDot <br />versus the City's wants, and secondly, design options are limited due to the edge of the <br />existing core downtown buildings on the south and the railroad line to the north. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.