Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Qualifications (cont.) <br /> <br />campuses received several benefits: <br /> <br />. Our experience with a range of local agencies allowed for campuses SWPPPs to be fast tracked <br />through coordination efforts with adjacent MS4s. Coordination efforts lowered compliance <br />expenses while bringing a broader range of educational opportunities. Further adding to the <br />educational experience campuses could provide to their students. <br /> <br />. Extensive municipal and watershed districts experience have enabled our staff to become <br />experts at short-term and long-term costs associated with maintaining stormwater <br />infrastructure. The experience allowed campuses to receive a customized SWPPP, which <br />efficiently lined up with their staffing capacity and limited campus resources to meet program <br />requirements. <br /> <br />. The depth of our water resources allowed for campuses to receive specialized BMPs that could <br />address highly sensitive trout streams in addition to fully developed campuses required to <br />retrofit existing facilities with minimal open space. <br /> <br />Wenck recently assisted seven Minnesota State Colleges and Universities campuses with the <br />completion of their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP), which were required in 90- <br />day window due to an extension from MPCA. Wenck's ability to dedicate the resources to the tight <br />scheduled allowed Campuses to meet the extension timeline. <br /> <br />Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Third Generation Management Plan <br /> <br />The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District took an innovative, outcome-based appro!lch to its "Third <br />Generation" Watershed Resources Management Plan. The District has termed this approach <br />"Performance Based Management." The District retained Wenck to develop a Plan that takes an <br />integrated approach to managing all the resources in the 177 square mile watershed. <br /> <br />The heart of the Plan is 11 individual subwatershed plans, with goals, policies, regulation, and <br />implementation strategies tailored to the unique needs of the resources in that subwatershed. In a <br />previous study, the District had used an intensive, Total Maximum Daily Load-like approach to model <br />current and 2020 pollutant loadings from the watershed and subsequent expected water quality of more <br /> <br />lake Phosphorus loading Response Model <br /> <br /> 80 <br />III C 70 <br />2111::i' 60 <br />,g~= <br />Q,ca. 50 <br />~ 0 c <br />.cla.2 40 <br />II.. Gl l\I <br />-mob <br />J! Cll C 30 <br />~.E8 <br />Gl ~ C 20 <br />.lie: 0 0 <br />l\I'" 0 <br />..IC> 10 <br /> 0 <br /> <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br />300 400 500 <br />Total Lake Phosphorus Load [Ib/yr] <br /> <br />T:I0598100INonDegradation ProposallQua!ifications.doc <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />-0-- Ultimate <br />___2020 <br />-0--2000 <br />_ 'Internal Load' <br /> <br />600 <br /> <br />700 <br /> <br />800 <br /> <br />,.:!,~Wenck <br />