Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />.M~ <br /> <br />CONSllLTING ENGINEERS <br /> <br />CIVil ENGINEERING: <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAl <br /> <br />MUNICIPAl <br /> <br />PLANNING <br /> <br />STRUCTURAl <br /> <br /> <br />_ SURVEYING <br /> <br />TRAFFIC <br /> <br />T~ANSPORT A nON <br /> <br />1326 Energy Park Drive <br />SL Paul, MN 55108 <br />612-644-4389 <br />Fax: 612-644-9446 <br /> <br />~8oo Shelard Parkway <br />Minneapolis, MN 55441 <br />612.546-0432 <br />Fax: 612-544-6398 <br /> <br />November 1, 1994 <br />File: 230-212-53 <br /> <br />Mr. Pat Klaers <br />City Administrator <br />City of Elk River <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />P.O. Box 490 <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> <br />RE: CONCORD STREET EASEMENT STATUS <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Klaers: <br /> <br />This letter is intended to update you once again on the current status of the Concord Street <br />easements. For clarity, I have attached an exhibit which will indicate the properties that <br />have given easements and those which have not. As you are aware, there are a total of 14 <br />parcels from which easements are required. These represent 12 different property owners. <br />As of today's date, we have received a total of eight easements from six different property <br />owners. Two other easements have been provided to the City but the property owners have <br />asked for those to be returned. I assume these two individuals would provide their <br />easements back to the City if the project were to move forward. That leaves four property <br />owners which have not provided easements nor given any indication whether or not they <br />plan to do so. One property owner's easement (McCarty) is not necessary for the project <br />to proceed. <br /> <br />Please let me know how you would like me to proceed with this project. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br /> <br />T::ZZ::7 <br /> <br />TJM:tw <br />Attachment <br /> <br />212-0108.noY <br />