Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. At this point I will end the list of suggested changes in the budget to reduce <br />the budget gap and request City Council input on these and other possible <br />adjustments. Some items that come to mind include: <br /> <br />. Further reductions in wage increases for employees in 1995 <br />· A further reduction in the ice arena contribution in 1995 <br />· A further reduction in the $10,000 Fire Department reserve for <br />equipment <br />. A reduction in the sealcoating program ($10,000?) <br />· Reductions in the capital outlay purchases <br />. Reductions in the new employees to be hired in 1995 <br />. Additional cuts in expenditures within individual departments <br />. Additional revenue increases throughout the budget <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I am sure all of the above listed items to reduce the budget gap to $50,900 <br />will not meet with unanimous Council approval or even majority Council <br />approval. The above items are only suggested for City Council discussion and <br />are offered as a starting point in order to get the budget gap under control. I <br />am sure that individual City Council members have other ideas on how to <br />reduce expenditures and add revenues. The above narrative should give us a <br />good starting point for our 9/6/94 worksession and should allow us to get <br />closer to a balanced budget for the 9112/94 budget worksession. <br /> <br />Regarding the overall City tax rate and growth in the net tax capacity, please <br />see the revised sheets from Finance Director Lori Johnson. The net tax <br />capacity growth sheet includes figures for growth up to 15 percent in 1995. <br />This would significantly offset the effect of the tax levy increase as discussed <br />by the City Council during the 8/29-30 worksessions. The Council should <br />note that the City is only 20 percent of the total property tax so if our City <br />taxes go up and other taxes from the County and School District remain the <br />same, then the net impact on the taxpayer will be small. The City has had a <br />very reasonable tax rate over the past few years and with an increase in the <br />net tax capacity anticipated, it seems that it is appropriate to now consider <br />additional expenditures to meet our growing needs. If the growth in the net <br />tax capacity does take place, the effect on the taxpayers will be relatively <br />minor. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The City must certify its maximum tax levy and budget to the County by <br />9/15. Action is required by the City Council either on 9/6 or 9/12 on a number <br />of City tax levy issues. Please see the attached tax levy resolutions for the <br />General Fund, EDA, and HRA as prepared by the Finance Director. The <br />Finance Director will also be asking for the Council to approve motions on <br />the budget, setting the Truth in Taxation public hearing (see attachment), <br />and adjusting some of the debt levies. <br />