My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.0. SR 09-06-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1994
>
09/06/1994 - SPECIAL
>
6.0. SR 09-06-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:55 AM
Creation date
5/22/2007 1:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/6/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Regarding potential cuts, the following items are suggested: <br /> <br />. $ 8,000 - transferring of expenses to the EDA fund (personnel, <br />video taping expenses, and Elk River pins) <br />. $12,000 - delay hiring some of the $80,000 worth of new 1995 <br />employees <br />· $15,000 - small cuts throughout most of the City departments <br />. $ 5,000 - by either purchasing now, cutting, or using undesignated <br />reserves for the police vehicle VCR capital outlay request <br /> <br />The above items equal $40.000 and further reduces the budget gap to <br />$104,000. If the EDA transfer is to take place, this should be reviewed and <br />accepted by the EDA at its 9/12/94 meeting. <br /> <br />Other potential cuts include the following: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. $10,600 by reducing 1995 employee wage increases...another City <br />Council Contingency cut <br />. $ 5,000 from the ice arena contribution request <br />. $ 1,500 from the Fire Department retirement fund contribution (no <br />contribution for the Chief) <br /> <br />These cuts of $17.100 will leave the City with a budget gap of $86,900. <br /> <br />It seems apparent that the City must generate more revenues. One <br />important source is from the Utilities department in order to help offset <br />general City expenses associated with our growth and development. Our <br />City growth and development provides more revenues for the Utilities and we <br />need more funds to manage our development. The Utilities contribution to <br />the City General Fund in the amount of $72,000 has not changed for eight <br />years (since the 1988 budget). A "round" number to look at for an increase <br />would be about $36,000. This should be requested from the Utilities and we <br />may also need to combine this increased contribution request with <br />establishing a percentage contribution from the Utilities based on gross <br />revenues. Until this request is authorized by the Council and accepted by the <br />Utilities, this $36,000 reduction in the General Fund gap should be placed in <br />the City cash flow reserve transfers (new total of $56,000). Please note that <br />this $36,000 should not be in the cash flow amount in the fmal budget and, if <br />additional revenues are not received from the Utilities, then additional cuts <br />in this amount need to be considered. If this additional revenue is obtained <br />from the Utilities, the new budget gap would become $50,900. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.