Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Emplovees Opting: to Obtain Familv Coverag:e Elsewhere <br /> <br />It is very likely, given the amount that employees pay for family coverage, <br />that many employees will choose to obtain coverage elsewhere; either <br />through a spouse or an individual plan. Many employees have already gotten <br />quotes on individual plans and some have already been approved for coverage <br />under those plans. Although the coverage includes co-pays and deductibles, <br />in many instances the savings exceed the maximum out of pocket expense. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />If employees do elect to get coverage elsewhere, the City will suffer through <br />increased premiums in the next contract year. Both the single and family <br />premiums would increase substantially to offset the loss of premium revenue. <br />Of the seventeen employees with family coverage, it is estimated that ten or <br />more of those may drop the City's coverage a get coverage elsewhere. This <br />will force premiums up substantially for the employees remaining on the <br />City's group health contract as there will be fewer premium dollars to pay for <br />the high utilization and large ongoing claims. This will mean that employees <br />with family coverage will pay even more in the future as will the City <br />because single premiums will also increase substantially. It is obvious that it <br />is in the group's best interest to try to retain as many family premiums as <br />possible. <br /> <br />Options Available to the Citv Council <br /> <br />During our earlier discussion on health insurance, several employer options <br />were presented. In addition, the Employee Health Insurance Advisory <br />Committee (members include Mark Thompson, Cheryll Edinger, Steve <br />Miller, Gary Schmitz, Darrell Mack and Lori Johnson) also discussed various <br />options available to the City in order to deal with the insurance issue. <br />Because the City did not receive as many quotes as it had hoped, some of <br />those options no longer apply. The items discussed by the Committee <br />include: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. Offer a cafeteria plan to all employees - The main reason for <br />discussing this option was to provide an incentive for employees <br />with single coverage to agree to lesser coverage, thereby reducing <br />the premiums for employees with family coverage. If the City <br />approves the HealthPartners contract for 1994-95, a cafeteria plan <br />based on the current mix of single and family coverage would cost <br />the City $16,936.92. If the City were to change to the PEIP Plan, <br />this program would cost $37,145.16. This option would benefit the <br />single employees by allowing them to select from a menu of <br />benefits, but would benefit the employees with family coverage only <br />if this allows for a change from comprehensive to an 80/20 plan. <br />