My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.5. SR 07-25-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1994
>
07/25/1994
>
4.5. SR 07-25-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:51 AM
Creation date
4/16/2007 8:55:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/25/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />employees electing family coverage is $180.59 per month. That means that <br />the 17 employees will pay an additional $36,840.36 for the upcoming contract <br />year. These employees will see a net pay reduction of approximately $90 per <br />paycheck (for employees pre taxing their premium, this amount will be <br />approximately $65). <br /> <br />If the City were to change to the PEIP contract, each employee would be <br />allowed to choose one of the four programs that would best fit his or her <br />needs. For purposes of calculating the cost to the City and employees, the <br />most expensive single plan will be used and an average family premium will <br />be used. The most expensive single premium is $172.75. Changing to this <br />plan would cost the City $6,486.48 annually. Of this, $2,702.70 would come <br />from the 1994 budget and the remainder from the 1995 budget. The average <br />family premium would be $535.61. However, it is likely that many <br />employees would select coverage with a premium of either $567.62 or <br />$584.79. Based on the average premium, the monthly increase per employee <br />would be $32.56, meaning that the employees would pay an additional <br />$6,642.24 annually excluding co-pays and de ductibles. With the PEIP Plan, <br />both the single and family coverage employees would incur out of pocket costs <br />for co-pays and deductibles. For the most part, the out of pocket maximum is <br />$1,000 per individual and $2,000 per family. <br /> <br />. Type of Covera!!e <br /> <br />The current contract with HealthPartners is for comprehensive medical <br />coverage. HealthPartners has also provided quotes for a co-pay and an 80/20 <br />plan. The co-pay plan results in a premium reduction of 3.2 percent and an <br />80/20 plan results in an additional reduction of approximately 5 percent. <br />Taking into consideration both of these reductions, the single premium would <br />be $202.43 and the family premium would be $640.89. Any of the plans <br />provided by HealthPartners would be more comprehensive than the plans <br />under the PEIP program. The PEIP coverage is more restrictive and, of <br />course, less comprehensive. <br /> <br />Union Issues <br /> <br />Any time there is a reduction in the aggregate value of benefits, the Union <br />must vote to approve the change in benefits. The City Council can decrease <br />the non-union employees benefits without employee approval. If the Council <br />elects to contract with PEIP and the Police Union does not approve the <br />reduction in benefits, the Police Union and non-union employees would each <br />be covered under different health insurance contracts. Although this is <br />certainly possible, it does limit options for either group due to the size of the <br />. groups and it may cause friction between the employee groups. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.