Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~ <br /> <br />DnitedHealth Group" <br /> <br />United Health Group <br />9900 Bren Road East MN008-E305 Minnetonka MN 55343 <br /> <br />Mr. Jeremy Barnhart <br />Planning Manager <br />City of Elk River <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> <br />Re: Response to City review comments dated December 22, 2006 <br />UnitedHealth Group Next Technology Center <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Barnhart: <br /> <br />UnitedHealth Group and the design team members have reviewed the City of Elk River's <br />comments regarding the November 27, 2006 submission for a Conditional Use Permit- <br />Aboveground Storage Tanks; Zone Change; Land Use Amendment and Administrative <br />Subdivision request. The following is a response to the City's comments as listed below on an <br />item per item basis. For your reference, the City's comments are shown in italicized text. <br /> <br />Comment: Fire department comments. The preliminary utility plan shows a hydrant location on <br />the south side of the complex on the east side of the outdoor storage area. The location is noted <br />on the pan but the labeling does not show "hydrant with auxiliary valve". Please note the <br />hydrant location on the southeast side of the outdoor storage area located on the south side of the <br />data center. <br /> <br />Response: Noted. This will be revised as part of the construction documents to be submitted in <br />mid January 2007. <br /> <br />Comment: Municipal Utilities. The plan reflects the facility being looped with an 8" DIP <br />watermain with fire hydrants. This plan is not clear where the water service to the building is. <br />Only one service line and water meter is permitted. The meter will be remote read but must <br />contain a by-pass loop for meter maintenance. <br /> <br />Response: Noted. This will be revised as part of the construction documents. <br /> <br />Comment: Engineering. Engineering comments will be forthcoming. <br /> <br />Response: UnitedHealth Group has not received written engineering comments from the City to <br />date. We have had verbal discussions with the City Engineer, but we have not yet received any <br />written comments. Please see the January 4, 2007 RLK Incorporated memo for an update to the <br />City Engineer's verbal comments. <br /> <br />Comment: Parking. The "proof of parking" south of the provided parking appears to conflict <br />with the detention basin. It is suggested that the proof of parking be shifted to the north side of <br />the building. <br /> <br />DATE RECEIVED <br />I - S-.-~ <br />