Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Case File: 06-15 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />can accommodate that vision with an Open Space Preservation plat. Policies are also established in <br />the comprehensive plan that should be reviewed with development. Under General Land Use <br />Policies, policy number 12 states... encourage "cluster developments" in rural areas in order to preseroe the semi- <br />rural character if the community, help implement the greenwqy concept, and maintain private property rights interests. <br />The open space preserve plat is a cluster development that preserves 50 percent of the site in a <br />conservation easement that maintains open space. <br /> <br />The Environmental Resources section of the Comprehensive Plan advises that staff work with <br />developers to preserve existing natural open space areas and areas that help implement the greenway <br />concept. As well as develop, preserve and protect environmental resources with the area, such as <br />forest, wetlands, water bodies and shorelines, with respect to open space, recreational uses, water <br />and air quality and natural ecosystems. This section encourages the preservation of natural contours <br />and soils, and preservation of natural vegetation. The city is to work with the developers to preserve <br />existing natural open space areas and allow the transfer of densities on a site in order to preserve site <br />features that otherwise might not be preserved. The open space preservation plat would accomplish <br />the goals of this section. The proposed plat has adverse effect on wetlands and large section of oak <br />trees will be altered by roadway and lot configuration at the south end of the plat. <br /> <br />The OSP ordinance does not require its use; however, it appears that the incentives do not outweigh <br />the costs of sustainable design. That being said, regardless of its 'style', every development should <br />echo the goals of the Comprehensive Plan; the cluster development presumably provides more <br />fmancial incentive to do so. <br /> <br />Lots <br /> <br />Sixteen lots are proposed with one access from 207th Street. The lots range from 2.5 acres to 4 acres <br />in area, Outlot A is 8 acres. <br /> <br />A wetland buffer of 25 feet is shown on the Site Plan. A building setback from the buffer of 20 feet <br />is not shown on the plan; it is not clear if all the proposed buildings will be able to meet these <br />setbacks. <br /> <br />Landscaoina <br /> <br />Interior lots require two trees and comer lots require four trees. Interior lots are to have one <br />boulevard tree and comer lots are to have two. The landscape plan does not show four trees on the <br />comer lots. The applicant should revise the landscape plan to meet this requirement. It is suggested <br />that these trees be planted at the time Final Plat improvements are completed, to establish the <br />streets cape as one consistent with a residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />Tree Preservation <br /> <br />Staff requested a tree preservation plan and ffi1ugation plan be provided to get a better <br />understanding of the removal proposed. A tree inventory was submitted and the grading plan <br />shows the proposed removal, a mitigation plan was not provided. The inventory includes 662 trees <br />the majority of the trees inventoried are in good condition. The Landscape Plan does not indicate <br />the number of trees to be removed. <br /> <br />S:\PLANNING\Case Files\2006\plat\P 06-15 Cranberry Ridge\Revised 10-31-06\pC 12_12_06 report. doc <br />