My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. SR 11-06-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2006
>
11/06/2006
>
5.3. SR 11-06-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:41 AM
Creation date
11/3/2006 9:12:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/6/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />o Discussion revolved around pre-tempered air, sub-metering and renewable energy (wind). <br />Chris stated that no additional, supplemental heat sources will be necessary. <br />o A side-bar discussion focused upon tax incentives/ credits that might be available to the <br />City. Tradability of credits was also discussed. <br />· Materials & Resources (13 pts possible... trying for 10) <br />o Deals with waste reduction, reuse of materials, and recycling all available products (or <br />using recycled products) as well as using locally produced, renewable materials. The three <br />points that the City cannot try to obtain deal with building reuse since this is new <br />construction. <br />o Jennifer stated that construction waste management will be built directly into the bid <br />proposal <br />· Indoor Environmental Quality (15 pts possible... trying for all 15) <br />o Deals mainly with ventilation and low VOC emitting materials, but also with lighting <br />(daylight, shading, etc.) and comfort levels (temps) A comment was made that the shading <br />will have to be automated or there will likely be problems (since each person perceives things <br />differently. <br />· Innovation in Design (5 pts possible... trying for all 5) <br />o Deals with specific topics regarding design innovation and gives credit for having LEED <br />accredited professionals (staff) Examples of topics included: public education components, <br />energy conservation library reference collection, green cleaning contract, City's overall <br />commitment to energy conservation (energy city, energy commission, etc.) <br /> <br />Jennifer stated that they are still in the schematic design stage of the planning for the library and added (when <br />asked) that the number of points being proposed may change depending upon feasibility/cost, etc. She stated <br />that every project that has been proposed has been changed in some way. As a result, they are proposing 58 <br />points (with six points possible for negotiation) to ensure that platinum rating can still be obtained. <br /> <br />July 19, 2006 <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing commented that the final plans for the new library have been submitted. They are not going to <br />meet the Platinum level for LEED certification. The design was just not conducive to making that level. Gold <br />or Silver is definitely possible though. A comment was made that LEED certification needs to be pursued with <br />the new YMCA also. Mayor Klinzing thanked the commission for all their hard work and dedication on these <br />issues. <br /> <br />October 18, 2006 <br /> <br />"'\lthough KKE was on the Agenda, they did not appear. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.