5.5. SR 08-21-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Case File: CU 06-21 Page 3 Kalway Construction/ \vaste management Landsccpina Landscaping requirements are based on the perimeter of the property. Due to the large size of the lots, se,Teral llundred trees would be required. No landscaping is proposed for the proposed building. Staff would recommend that 5 overstory trees be pro\rided in the rear surrounding dle building and paring area for shade and 'visual interest. The applicant has stated no objection to tllls suggestion Gradina, Drainaae and Utilities No utility extensions are planned or proposed. Fire Department The Fire Department reviewed the proposed site plan with respect to access, circulation, and fire suppression. TIle Fire Department expressed no concern with access or circulation around dle building, and noted that any internal fire suppression requirements will be satisfied in the review of the building. Architecture The owner is proposing to utilize tilt-up concrete panles. In order to establish a campus feel in the immediate area, staff and the Planning Commission suggested that the panels maintain a consistent theme \vith the existing gas power plant. The applicant agreed, but noted that the power plant is block consuuction, and the office/ garage building is tilt-up concrete panel. Staff can support the materials being a color similar, rather that requiring identical building materials. Setbacks Based on the re,rie\v of tlle sU1\Tey, it appears that the building encroaches O\Ter the property line. To a\Toid Ilaving to meet established setback requirements, this property line should be adjusted, either by removal, or relocation. Waste Management owns the property on both sides of this line. standards for Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit (Section 30-654) The issuance of a Conditional Use Permit can be ordered only if the use at the proposed location: 1. tf7illnot endangel~ il!/tlre or detliJJlentalfy affect the 1Ise and el!}OylJlcnt of other propertY ill the iJJ1Jliediate vicinity or the public health, safery, morals, comf01t, convenience or general lve!fare of the neighborhood or the city. The proposed building is seen as an accessory component to the land fill operations, and does not increase the impacts on adjacent properties. 2. IVili be consistent with the cOJJprehensive pian. The proposed building and land use is consistent ,vith the comprehensive plan. 3. lV""i//llot inpede the llo1FJJal and orderb' developJlien! and ZIJprOVeJJlellt of Stll7YJtl11dillg vacant property. The proposed building does not appear to impede the development of surrounding property. S:\PLA...NNING\Case Files\2006\CUP\CU 06-21 Kalway-\Vaste lvIgmt\StaffReport to CounciLdoc