My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.9. SR 03-21-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1994
>
03/21/1994
>
7.9. SR 03-21-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:29 AM
Creation date
8/3/2006 12:58:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/21/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Accessory Structures, OA <br />March 21, 1994 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />The proposed ordinance offers several changes to the size limitations in <br />all districts. The proposed ordinance also eliminates the conditional <br />use permit process as a means of exceeding maximum size and number <br />requirements of accessory structures. Instead, applicants will need to <br />obtain a variance and prove hardship in order to exceed the standard. <br /> <br />3. The proposed ordinance does not distinguish between agricultural <br />accessory structures and non-agricultural accessory structures. <br /> <br />4. The proposed ordinance would no longer allow metal skin accessory <br />structures in the RIB, RIC, RID, and RIE zoning districts as a <br />conditional use. <br /> <br />5. Metal skin buildings in the Al and RIA zoning districts will be <br />allowed on all parcels without requiring a 300 foot setback from <br />neighboring homes. Accessory buildings containing livestock will still <br />need to meet the 300 foot setback. Metal skin accessory structures <br />must be painted to be compatible with the existing home. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the code <br />amendments. There were very few comments from the public on these <br />particular changes. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />It is recommended the City Council approve the code amendment as <br />presented in the attached ordinance. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ccaccess.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.