Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Personnel Memo <br />February 10, 1994 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />where the "buck would stop." This added responsibility is certainly worth some <br />pay increase. I still recommend $45,000 for 1994 for this added responsibility. <br />Bill is currently at $43,169 in 1994. <br /> <br />Regarding the extra vacation issue, this is more of a principle issue with Bill since <br />he has more comp time on the books than he can reasonably take in any given <br />year. Part of this request for an extra week of vacation relates to the fact that <br />when Steve Ach was hired, he got three weeks of vacation; and that when Bill was <br />hired he did not appreciate or understand the fact that there was some negotiations <br />for City benefits that were possible. I have mixed feelings on this vacation issue <br />but strongly support the pay increase. <br /> <br />ITEM #8 - Employee Vacation Schedule...This issue received very little <br />discussion on 1/3/94. A few employees who are near the top of the vacation <br />schedule are asking whether or not the City would consider adding more vacation <br />time for employees that have worked for the City for more than 20 years - similar <br />to what exists at the Utilities or the County. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The above paragraphs are a recap of the issues discussed on 1/3/94. The other two issues <br />that may need a brief discussion at this meeting are the employees benefit issue and the <br />personnel coordinator position. At this time I do not expect any significant change in our <br />employee benefits in 1994. Restructuring the City Benefits Program is a time consuming <br />endeavor and at the very earliest this is a 1995 project. Regarding the personnel <br />coordinator position , I think that there is more than enough personnel related work to <br />keep this employee busy on an ongoing basis and I still recommend the filling of this <br />position. <br /> <br />I am not 100% sure of the overall intent of this personnel work session by the City <br />Council, but, I and the rest of the City Staff await City Council direction on how to <br />proceed in dealing with the requested items from the 1/3/94 meeting and other City <br />personnel issues. <br /> <br />. <br />