Laserfiche WebLink
<br />needs for funds is difficult or impossi- <br />ble, and may result in lost opportunities <br />for returns. <br />Further, in times of substantial infla- <br />e tion, an. association needs to make <br />preservation of the special-fund assets <br />in terms of constant dollars or purchas- <br />ing power a major consideration, if it <br />hopes to accomplish its objectives in an <br />economical manner. Thus some expo- <br />sure to loss is almost inevitable; how- <br />ever, it's likely to be substantially less <br />than for alternative investments. <br />Stocks and other equity investments <br />are subject to substantial fluctuations in <br />value over the short term. A relatively <br /> <br />small fund such as the typical volunteer <br />fire relief association needs to consider <br />carefully whether it's appropriate to <br />subject the fund to fluctuations in <br />investment value that are likely if a <br />large percentage of fund investments <br />are in equities or other even more <br />volatile investments. <br />This would be particularly important <br />to the individual firefighter if the relief <br />association's bylaws specify a "defined <br />contribution" benefit system. Under <br />this approach (also known as "split- <br />the-pie"), the pension a retiree <br />receives is calculated as a percentage <br />of the association's assets at the time <br /> <br />the firefighter retires, based on the <br />retiree's total years of service com- <br />pared with the total years of service of <br />all the association members. If the <br />relief association were using heavy <br />equity investments, a retiree could be <br />disadvantaged if he or she happened to <br />retire at a time when the stock market <br />was down. <br />Equity investments could also create <br />a problem for the city if the relief <br />association uses a "defined benefit" <br />system, where the association's bylaws <br />spell out the actual number of dollars of <br />pension it pays per year of service. <br />The financial support the city must <br />contribute each year depends on the <br />comparison of the association's accrued <br />liability for pensions with its assets. <br />The city's contribution is defined as a <br />specified percentage of any deficit. <br />If the association's funds are in <br />equity investments, a slump in the <br />value of those investments could create <br />an actuarial deficit. This in turn would <br />trigger a requirement for increased <br />funding from the city. In short, invest- <br />ing the relief association's funds in <br />equities could make the city's annual <br />financial contribution fluctuate, possibly <br />substantially, and thus complicate the <br />city's budgeting problems. <br />This problem could be compounded <br />because of a change in the law several <br />years ago regarding the procedures for <br />increasing benefits. Formerly, the city <br />needed to approve any relief associa- <br />tion benefit increases. Now, however, <br />if an actuarial surplus exists in the relief <br />association, the association can <br />increase benefits without city approval, <br />up to a specified percentage of the <br />surplus.3 Thus, if a relief association's <br />funds were invested heavily in stocks, <br />for example, and the stock market rose <br />dramatically (as it has over the past 18 <br />months), the association would be able <br />to increase its benefit, based on the <br />existing surplus. However, if the stock <br />market then took a dive, it could create <br />an actuarial deficit. Because the city <br />has a statutory obligation to provide <br />funding for actuarial deficits, the city <br />would be left paying for the cost of <br />those increased benefits. <br />This peculiarity in the law as it <br />applies to defined benefit plans would <br />seem to encourage a relief association <br />to engage in risky investment. After <br />all, it would seem big gains can increase <br />benefits, but big losses won't decrease <br />them. But that's not the whole story. <br />Possible personal liability of those who <br /> <br />CHEMICAL TESTING <br />FOR <br />HAZARDOUS WASTE <br /> <br />Including PCB's In <br /> <br />* Transformer Oil <br />* Water <br />* Waste Water <br />* Sludges <br /> <br />For More Information Contact <br /> <br />~v ~ MINNESOTA VALLEY <br />TL TESTING LABORATORY. INC. <br /> <br />326 Center St. New Ulm, MN 56073 <br />328 Chester 51. 51. Paul, MN 55107 <br />In Minnesota Call Toll Free: <br />1.800.782.3557 <br />Outstate Call Collect <br />507.354.8517 (New Ulm) <br />612.228.1851 (St. Paul) <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />Minnesota Cities <br /> <br />* <br /> <br /> <br />