My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.10. SR 04-19-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1993
>
04/19/1993
>
6.10. SR 04-19-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:12 AM
Creation date
6/15/2006 8:53:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/19/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PP & Variance, Meadowvale Heights <br />April 16, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />ADDITIONAL STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS <br /> <br />In addition to the Planning Commission recommendations, staff <br />offers the following: <br /> <br />The preliminary plat incorrectly notes the side setback <br />for a house as 5 feet. The setback is 10 feet. <br /> <br />Staff feels Lot 28, Block 4A, Lot 6, Block 2A, and Lot 23, <br />Block 1B, are questionable for placing a house on them <br />with the revised layout of the lots. The developers <br />should be questioned on these lots. <br /> <br />A DNR permit is not required for crossing the ditch in the <br />southeast corner of the plat, however, an Army Corps of <br />Engineers permit may be necessary. This would be the <br />responsibility of the developer to obtain. <br /> <br />Staff recommends this plat is contingent upon the <br />extension of trunk sewer and water to serve the plat, and <br />adequate water capacity without the need for a water tower. <br /> <br />VARIANCE <br /> <br />Staff refers the City Council to Section 900.40 of the Elk <br />River City Code of Ordinances which contains the Five Standards <br />to consider when reviewing a variance request. The Planning <br />Commission felt the developer met the Five Standards for <br />granting a variance on Elgin Street, and recommended approval <br />for this road to exceed the maximum length of a dead-end. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.