Laserfiche WebLink
<br />pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes, <br />identifying any improvements necessary, <br /> <br />\\'2ste,\Y2ter will be discharged into the City of E.!k River Sanitary SeYler Systenl. The lvasteYlater <br />,-\'iH be treated at the Elk River Wastewater Treatnlent Plant. <br /> <br />d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique and location and <br />discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. <br />Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems. <br /> <br />The project does not require the disposal of liquid animal manure. <br /> <br />19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions <br />a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: Surface minimum >15' average based on <br />available well records and the project's own subsurface soil boring program. <br />to bedrock: >Not Encountered at 15' - 20' Borings minimum > average Greater than 150' <br />per available well records <br /> <br />Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: <br />sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize <br />environmental problems due to any of these hazards. <br /> <br />None of the above mentioned site hazards are known to exist on the site. Exhibit H contains <br />information from the County weD log search. <br /> <br />b. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity <br />and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. <br />Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. <br /> <br />Soil classifications per Soil Survey of Sherburne County, Minnesota USDA, NRCS. <br /> <br />Line No, <br />t <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br /> <br />Man Unit <br />32B <br />32D <br />32E <br />125 <br />346 <br />454B <br />540 <br />544 <br />565 <br />730A <br />1110 <br />1254 <br />1260B <br /> <br />Soil TVDe <br />Nebish Fine Sandy Loam <br />Nebish Fine Sandy Loam <br />Nebish Fine Sandy Loam <br />Beltrami Fine Sandy Loam <br />Talmoon Loam <br />Mahtomedia Loamy Course Sand <br />Seelyeville Muck <br />Cathro Muck <br />EckvoIl Loamy Fine Sand <br />Sanburn Fine Sandy Loam <br />Isan Sandy Loam <br />Rice Lake Fine Sandy Loam <br />Stone Lake - Nebish Complex <br /> <br />Drainage Description <br />E Excessively Drained (*) Some",'hat <br />MW Moderately "'ell Drained <br />P Poorly Drained (*) Some'\vhat <br />VP Very Poorly Drained <br />'" \" ell Drained <br /> <br />Slope lOA> ) <br />2 ... 60/0 <br />12 - 18% ,,! <br />18 -35% W <br />o ... 30/0 <br />0-2% <br />1 - 60/0 <br />0-10/0 <br />0-1% <br />0-3% <br />o - 2010 <br />0-20/0 <br />0-3010 <br />2 - 60/0 <br /> <br />Drainae:e Descrintion <br />W <br /> <br />MW <br />P <br />E <br />VP <br />VP <br />M\\' <br />E* <br />p <br />P* <br />E <br /> <br />The soils w'ithin the proj ect site are generally within the 850/0 - 1000/0 passing the number 10 sieve, <br />thereby placing them in a category of fine grained soils, thereby inhibiting rapid percolation to <br />ground'\\'ater tables. The proposed land use is single family residential. The potential for <br />contamination from lyastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils is -very much less than what <br />may haye existed ~~ith the current agricultural land use. Ponding sites ,viII likely have little or no <br />standing "tater for long periods, except during heavy rain events and sno\y melt. The potential for <br />contamination is very 10"", <br /> <br />20. Solid 'Yastes~ hazardous 'yastes~ storage tanks <br />