Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority Minutes <br />May 15, 1989 <br /> <br />5. Revolving Loan Fund <br /> <br />Mr. Fursman updated the Council on a Revolving Loan Fund. He indicated <br />that the Finance Committee has met and reviewed the Revolving Loan Fund. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Council that they would review the Revolving <br />Loan Fund and come back with a decision for approval at the next meeting. <br /> <br />6. Community Reinvestment Fund <br /> <br />Mr. Fursman indicated that the Community Reinvestment Fund is an <br />organization which pools loans from around the State and sells them at a <br />discount in the form of a bond. He stated that the City of Elk River has <br />been invited to sell the A11too1 loan in June, which would allow the City <br />to put $100,000 into the Revolving Loan Fund immediately as opposed to <br />collecting it in increments of $2,500 each month. He indicated that this <br />would allow the City to build the reserves in the Revolving Loan Fund <br />quickly. <br /> <br />Mr. Fursman also indicated that the Department of Trade and Economic <br />Development is making new demands on the use of their grant monies which <br />would cut signifiant1y into the amount of money available from the sale. <br /> <br />Mr. Fursman indicated <br />through taking loans <br />A11too1 loan. <br /> <br />an option to this type of sale would be <br />at local institutions collateralized by the <br /> <br />that <br />out <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Economic Development Authority to review this <br />matter and bring it back to the next EDA meeting with a recommendation. <br /> <br />7. TIF Policy/Application <br /> <br />Mr. Fursman indicated that the City Tax Increment Financing policy has <br />been updated to appropriately reflect law changes and unwritten policy <br />modifications. He indicated that the biggest change in the policy is the <br />application with the fee of $5,000. He stated that the $5,000 would be <br />required as a non refundable upfront fee for administrative expenses. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER HOLMGREN MOVED TO ADOPT THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING POLICY <br />CONTINGENT UPON THE CITY ATTORNEY APPROVING THE POLICY. COMMISSIONER <br />KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. <br /> <br />pursued regarding the $5,000 fee and whether or not the fee <br />refunded if the project does not go through. Mike Mulrooney <br />that several other cities that have the fee involved in their <br />refund a portion of the fee if the project does not go <br /> <br />Discussion <br />should be <br />suggested <br />TIF policy <br />through. <br /> <br />COMMI SSIONER HOLMGREN MOVED TO ADD TO THE ABOVE MOTION, THAT ANY UNUSED <br />PORTION OF THE TIF FEE FOR A PROJECT THAT DOES NOT GO THROUGH COMPLETION <br />BE REFUNDED TO APPLICANT. COMMISSIONER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />THE MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED 5-0. <br />