My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-25-1982 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1980 - 1989
>
1982
>
01-25-1982 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:57 AM
Creation date
4/25/2006 2:30:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
1/25/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />January 25, 1982 <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />Page Six <br /> <br />Mr. Dan Goehringer, a resident from the area where the PUD is proposed, <br />indicated that if the area was rezoned and doubles were built, there would <br />be more sewer problems than there already is. <br /> <br />Rick Breezee indicated that this area would be sewered with City sewer and <br />water, which would be done in phases. <br /> <br />Mr. Goehringer then stated that when they purchased their home in Elk River, <br />Mr. Larson promised them that there would be no double homes built. <br /> <br />Rick Breezee indicated that with the economy as it is, that doubles would <br />become what people could afford. <br /> <br />Rick Foster and Ted Lundgren \vill come back to the Planning Commission '-lith <br />either 1) a request for a variance, or 2) a request for a zone change, de- <br />pending on Council action. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gunkel stated that she felt that it was the store that was <br />causing the problem. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce felt that this was inconsistent with most PUD's, which <br />are 20 acres. If it is less, then rezoning or a variance request has to be <br />made. <br /> <br />MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PEARCE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER KREUSER, TO TABLE <br />THIS REQUEST FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION. <br /> <br />8. Consider Brutger's Re-subdivision of Lots on 191st Avenue <br /> <br />Rick Breezee indicated that in the City ordinance it states that every <br />building must abut upon a public street. The Brutger Company is asking <br />for a re-subdivision to make 3 lots into 5. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gunkel inquired as to what will be built there. <br /> <br />Rick Breezee indicated that rental apartments - 30 units - which he in- <br />dicated on the land use/zoning maps. The representative from Brutger's <br />was not able to be at this meeting, but John Oliver, of John Oliver and <br />Associates, was present. <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding how many units were to be built and were they <br />to have covered parking stalls. It was also indicated that they would not <br />be like parking stalls in the Riverbend Trailor Park in Dayton. It was not <br />kno,vu whether these were to be government subsidized or not. <br /> <br /> <br />MOTION BY CO}fMISSIONER PEARCE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GUNKEL TO APPROVE <br />THE RE-SUBDIVISION FROM 3 LOTS TO 5 FOR THE BRUTGER COMPANY. MOTION PASSED <br />4-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.