07-28-1980 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 3 July 28, 1980 to the east section line of Sec. 34 and south to Fifth Avenue. The south part of the PUD, west of Highvmy 169, be returned to previous plan under R4 zoning. Commissioner Fox asked if there were any problems with Fourth Street in that ~ is in the C2 and ~ is in R4. ~~. Johnson saw no problem. Commissioner Driessen asked about Lot 360 on Holt and thought that the ovmers there might acquire that property and we would be splitting zoning there. V~. Johson stated it would be split from along back property line and it has to be split someplace there. ~tr. and ~trs. ~nton Hipp (of the East Side Citizens Group) asked about PUDs and why 20 acres. Vtr. Middaugh explained this to them. ~~. Hipp said that he felt a developer would not be interested in talking to a neighborhood group after it had all been platted. He also felt that there was less control and that they had less say as to what went on so far as public hearings. The procedure was again explained to him by lfrr. ~tiddaugh and the Planning Cowmission. Court House ftxea - ~tr. Johnson suggested that in terms of land use the southern 200 acres should be planned for single f~mily lots with RIB zoning. The Court House has 20 acres which falls into C2 zoning. He discussed the possibility and probability of increased activity at the Court House at full development with the number of jobs created and suggested the 20 acres on the west side of the Court House be zoned C3. Also, any development along Highway 10 on the west should be required to face on a service road. South of Highway 10 and east of the Court House should be higher density land use, PUD with 40 acres toward the fairgrounds. He also felt a developer should be restricted until ade~uate services can be provided and some of the problems worked out in that area. ~rr. Middaugh indicated on the Zoning Map, Custom Motors Salvage Yard and suggested changing it to RIB so that this could not be expanded and also so that other industries \'Tould not have a "foot in the door" in that area. He also said Custom Motors would be able to continue its operation, but would not be able to expand. Commissioner Driessen expressed his concern about the zoning change where his house is located and if it were destroyed would he be able to rebuild. COID~issioner Fox suggested it would have to go through a zone change before he could rebuild. Paul Carton discussed the four acres he would like added to the I-1 zone. This property is located north of Co. Road 1, east of the railroad tracks. He asked about building permits for there and also felt that the area should conform with that near it. Commissioner Fox felt that changing this to I-I with the 5\.ramp bet1'Teen it and the residential area vTould prov-ide a good buf:fer zone. ~~. Carton said he could not see anyone wanting to put a house on that property. ~tro Middaugh said there should be a clarification on conditional use for C-3 inv-ol ving light manufacturing as to \.rhether it \,ras sale and manufacturing ; it should require both sales and retail including manufacturing as it would be both. Commissioner Fox recoID~ended the language should be changed. Commissioner Lucas said he did not like the vTord manufacturing as it could be twisted around to mean something else.