05-29-1979 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

bL}:~ RI"\P"R PL4.4..JlTJ.JIlJG COI~U;lISSI01~ MEDTII'-TG HELD I1T TI-R ELK E,IVf.c~ PU3LIC lI3PJiRY l~,:Ia~l 29, 1979 Members Present: Commissioners Fox, Driessen, Eiw(le, Rootes, Lucas, Zabee, and rr'racy ~ .Also Present: Communi t~)T L'evelOT)ment TIirector Herbert S. .Adol:phson, and Zack: J o:bJlS on . 1. Call Meeting to Order Meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Wally Fox. 2 . T,Tinutes The April 30th minutes were amended so as to correct an error ,dlich allowed for a 6H -\Taiance instead of 5' 6" '\.rariance, (see section num'ber 4-motion in , -11 ~ . 1 ~O . b . , ) m'- 6:'1..l.. . ~ be.' L -. ~ _6 Rprl_ ~ ~ . m~nu~es. ~lle amendec mOu~on mace y ommlSSloner ucas ana seconded by Commissioner HiPLle. It read the same as the orginal, with the change in the variance from 6ft to 5 t 6" . Il~otion and minutes for 1Joth the April 23rd and 30th minutes were passed 7-0. 3. Consideration of Eruno Lenz's Re-zoning Request See April 30th minutes for specifics about the re-zoning re~uest. Dave Shappell was present to answer any questions concerning the request, and also ,. ~. I · b" , " "'h ~ 01 .~ reques-r;1.ng a mo IJlon LO -gran'Tr _J..S reques't Ior re-zonJ.ng 1:. e 1:11"0 c...-~~. acre 81 !.res, (from 1-1 to R-2). Of the 5 people living within this area only Roger Johnson who operates a metal shop, voiced disapproval through Commissioner Fox. Mr. Johnson felt the re-zoning change could present problems for him in the future. I'}IOTIOIT l~IP.DE :BY CO~Ml~iISSIONER BOOTES TO GP~lilTT T:t:3 PXQtJEST FOR RE-ZOI~JII\JG ThTO SITES 01\LY, MeR 21~- .ACPtES 110 SIZE. ~IIE I,10TIO}J itiJtS SEGOl-mED 3Y C01'iJ]:IISSI01J!;:R IJRIESSEIJ. rrB~ l'iIOTIO:rZ 1rl.F...S PASSE:]) 6 TO 1. 4.. Consideration of Garj- Sal1t\'Jires Conditional Use Fermi t There was a public hearing to consider the permit. Hr. Santwire explained his to~~house project, which would include 8 to 10 unl~ townhouse, costing about $100,000 each. This vlo1J.ld inclu.de tennis court(s), a se't'.!age area, and a green landscaped area. A nUJDber of people viho Ii -ve in tIle general area, two from the immediate area, where present to voice their opposition to the :project, ( 6 families out of a possible 11). Some of the arguments against the project that 11ere discussed. are as follo~Js: 1. j)er.l.si t~l of area-stretcI1il1g the use of land.. 2. Too much lake traffic, 10 extra families. 3. street traffic }:',roblems jlparking e 4. Present houses Itlould. lose their pri '-lacy. 5. Tovaw.ouse not in the character or tIle 1 al<: e a.rea. 6. Vie~'J of cLoc}:s on the to't'lmhouse 0 7. Maintenance of townhouse/land.